Wendy L. Gammon
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- General Health Professions top 5%
- Family Practice top 2%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Gayle Gliva‐McConveyKaren LewisTonya ThompsonCarrie BohnertCathy M. SmithHenrike HölzerAmelia WallaceKathleen M. Mazor
- Topics
- Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers)Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers)Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaAcademic MedicineMedical Education
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaGermany
In The Last Decade
Wendy L. Gammon
9 papers receiving 473 citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 75
- Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 276
- Physiology 263
- General Health Professions 196
- Family Practice 93
- Sociology and Political Science 46
Countries citing papers authored by Wendy L. Gammon
This map shows the geographic impact of Wendy L. Gammon's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Wendy L. Gammon with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Wendy L. Gammon more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Wendy L. Gammon
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Wendy L. Gammon. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Wendy L. Gammon. The network helps show where Wendy L. Gammon may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Wendy L. Gammon
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Wendy L. Gammon. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Wendy L. Gammon based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Wendy L. Gammon. Wendy L. Gammon is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | The Association of Standardized Patient Educators (ASPE) Standards of Best Practice (SOBP)breakdown → | 340 |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 15 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 53 | |
| 7 | 42 | |
| 8 | 6 | |
| 9 | Auger injuries in children. | 9 |
About Wendy L. Gammon
Wendy L. Gammon is a scholar working on Family Practice, Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health and Health, having authored 9 papers that have together received 508 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Innovations in Medical Education (6 papers), Interprofessional Education and Collaboration (2 papers) and Simulation-Based Education in Healthcare (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Family Practice (93 citations), Research and Theory (11 citations) and Physiology (263 citations). Wendy L. Gammon has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Gayle Gliva‐McConvey, Karen Lewis, Tonya Thompson, Carrie Bohnert, Cathy M. Smith, Henrike Hölzer, Amelia Wallace, Kathleen M. Mazor, Michele P. Pugnaire and Eric Alper. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Academic Medicine and Medical Education.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.