W. Michael Reed

1.7k total citations
63 papers, 1.2k citations indexed

About

W. Michael Reed is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Science Applications. According to data from OpenAlex, W. Michael Reed has authored 63 papers receiving a total of 1.2k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 32 papers in Education, 21 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 17 papers in Computer Science Applications. Recurrent topics in W. Michael Reed's work include Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (13 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (11 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (10 papers). W. Michael Reed is often cited by papers focused on Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (13 papers), Gender and Technology in Education (11 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (10 papers). W. Michael Reed collaborates with scholars based in United States, Switzerland and France. W. Michael Reed's co-authors include Min Liu, David J. Ayersman, Jonathan deHaan, David B. Palumbo, Richard C. Overbaugh, John K. Burton, Min Liu, Min Liu, Gail Fitzgerald and Daniel Anderson and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Computers in Human Behavior and Journal of Educational Computing Research.

In The Last Decade

W. Michael Reed

61 papers receiving 976 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
W. Michael Reed United States 19 644 595 250 203 197 63 1.2k
Dale S. Niederhauser United States 15 807 1.3× 446 0.7× 219 0.9× 193 1.0× 141 0.7× 43 1.3k
Chin‐Hsi Lin Hong Kong 23 951 1.5× 466 0.8× 100 0.4× 242 1.2× 175 0.9× 52 1.5k
Theodore J. Kopcha United States 19 999 1.6× 376 0.6× 159 0.6× 241 1.2× 149 0.8× 41 1.5k
Barbara L. Grabowski United States 16 611 0.9× 599 1.0× 50 0.2× 166 0.8× 102 0.5× 52 1.1k
Krista Glazewski United States 21 1.2k 1.8× 517 0.9× 241 1.0× 329 1.6× 139 0.7× 83 1.7k
J. Terwel Netherlands 19 1.0k 1.6× 628 1.1× 59 0.2× 89 0.4× 188 1.0× 75 1.4k
Wilhelmina Savenye United States 17 567 0.9× 345 0.6× 119 0.5× 123 0.6× 132 0.7× 62 966
Roy B. Clariana United States 23 626 1.0× 726 1.2× 91 0.4× 207 1.0× 59 0.3× 87 1.4k
Ioanna Vekiri Greece 10 759 1.2× 534 0.9× 291 1.2× 91 0.4× 212 1.1× 11 1.2k
Daniel Churchill Hong Kong 23 990 1.5× 376 0.6× 75 0.3× 339 1.7× 355 1.8× 64 1.7k

Countries citing papers authored by W. Michael Reed

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of W. Michael Reed's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. Michael Reed with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. Michael Reed more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by W. Michael Reed

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. Michael Reed. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. Michael Reed. The network helps show where W. Michael Reed may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. Michael Reed

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. Michael Reed. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. Michael Reed based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. Michael Reed. W. Michael Reed is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Reed, W. Michael & John K. Burton. (2019). Educational Computing and Problem Solving.
2.
deHaan, Jonathan, et al.. (2010). The effect of interactivity with a music video game on second language vocabulary recall. Language learning & technology. 14(2). 74–94. 150 indexed citations
3.
Reed, W. Michael, et al.. (2006). Computer technology, education and disability: experiences of postsecondary students who are blind or visually impaired. 1 indexed citations
4.
Reed, W. Michael, et al.. (2000). Asynchronous learning networks and cognitive apprenticeship: a potential model for teaching complex problem-solving skills in corporate environments. 3 indexed citations
5.
Reed, W. Michael, et al.. (1998). The effect of hypermedia development on high school students' knowledge acquistion, general problem-solving skills, and general design skills. 7(4). 333–363. 3 indexed citations
6.
Ayersman, David J. & W. Michael Reed. (1998). Relationships Among Hypermedia-Based Mental Models and Hypermedia Knowledge. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 30(3). 222–238. 14 indexed citations
7.
Reed, W. Michael, et al.. (1998). The effects of hypermedia knowledge and learning style on the construction of group concept maps. Computers in Human Behavior. 14(1). 1–22. 17 indexed citations
8.
Reed, W. Michael, et al.. (1997). The effects of learning style and task type on hypermedia-based mental models. 6(3). 285–304. 4 indexed citations
9.
Reed, W. Michael, et al.. (1997). Lessons from restructuring experiences : stories of change in professional development schools. State University of New York Press eBooks. 18 indexed citations
10.
Reed, W. Michael & John G. Wells. (1997). Merging the Internet and Hypermedia in the English Language Arts. Computers in the Schools. 13(3-4). 75–102. 3 indexed citations
11.
Reed, W. Michael, et al.. (1995). Computers and elementary education students: a ten-year analysis. 6(1). 5–24. 15 indexed citations
12.
Reed, W. Michael, David J. Ayersman, & Min Liu. (1995). The Effect of Hypermedia Instruction on Stages of Concern of Students with Varying Authoring Language and Prior Hypermedia Experience. Journal of Research on Computing in Education. 27(3). 297–317. 2 indexed citations
13.
Reed, W. Michael. (1994). Assessment Measures for Hypermedia: Development of the IAHK. Society for Information Technology & Teacher Education International Conference. 1994(1). 412–415. 4 indexed citations
14.
Reed, W. Michael & David B. Palumbo. (1992). The Effect of Basic Instruction on Problem Solving Skills over an Extended Period of Time. Journal of Educational Computing Research. 8(3). 311–325. 12 indexed citations
15.
Reed, W. Michael. (1990). The effects of computer-based writing instruction and mode of discourse on writing performance and writer anxieties. Computers in Human Behavior. 6(3). 211–221. 11 indexed citations
16.
Reed, W. Michael. (1989). The Effectiveness of Composing Process Software:. Computers in the Schools. 6(1-2). 67–82. 5 indexed citations
17.
Reed, W. Michael. (1988). Problem-Solving, Writing Theory, and Composing Process Software. Computers in the Schools. 4(3-4). 178–190. 1 indexed citations
18.
Reed, W. Michael & John K. Burton. (1985). Effective and Ineffective Evaluation of Essays: Perceptions of College Freshmen.. The Journal of Teaching Writing. 4(2). 270–283. 16 indexed citations
19.
Reed, W. Michael, et al.. (1985). Initiation versus Intensification: The Effect of Topic-Type on the Writing Performance of Basic Writers.. Research in the Teaching of Developmental Education. 4(2). 41–49.
20.
Reed, W. Michael. (1983). Daly and Miller's Writing Apprehension Test and Hunt's T-Unit Analyses: Two Measurement Precautions in Writing Research.. Journal of research and development in education. 21(2). 1–8. 19 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026