Virginia Cox

1.5k citations
31 papers · 356 indexed · h-index 9

Impact in

  • Classics top 2%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture
  • History top 1%
    • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

Papers in

    • Renaissance Literature and Culture 8
    • Medieval Literature and History 4
    • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 16
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity 9

Virginia Cox

23 papers receiving 284 citations

Peers

Virginia Cox
Comparison fields: 5 of 71
  • Classics 63
  • History 124
  • Neurology 86
  • Philosophy 43
  • Literature and Literary Theory 34
Replace David Bates with:
David Bates United Kingdom
John Osborne Canada
Margo Todd United States
Ralph Cohen Brazil
William Nelson United States
Michael Warren United States
Stephen Pender Canada
Abel Abel United States
Lily Ross Taylor Australia
Kenneth Baxter Wolf United States
Virginia Cox relative to David Bates United Kingdom David Bates's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×4.3×
David Bates · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Virginia Cox

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Virginia Cox's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Virginia Cox with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Virginia Cox more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Virginia Cox

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Virginia Cox. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Virginia Cox. The network helps show where Virginia Cox may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Virginia Cox, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Virginia Cox Line = papers co-authored together Virginia Cox links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1
Gender Equity in the Accounting Profession: An Update
20166
2 20164
3 20131
4 20132
5 20131
6 20108
7 2009135
8 20093
9 200815
10 200627
11 20052
12 19990
13 199920
14 199912
15 19970
16 199720
17 19951
18 19943
19 19943
20 19917

About Virginia Cox

Virginia Cox is a scholar working on Classics, History, General Arts and Humanities, Religious studies and Literature and Literary Theory, having authored 31 papers that have together received 356 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (16 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (9 papers), Renaissance Literature and Culture (8 papers), Medieval Literature and History (4 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (4 papers), Historical Influence and Diplomacy (2 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (2 papers) and Italian Literature and Culture (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (63 citations), History (124 citations), Neurology (86 citations), Philosophy (43 citations) and Literature and Literary Theory (34 citations). Virginia Cox has collaborated with scholars based in United States and India. Frequent co-authors include Sundeep Mangla, Johanna T Fifi, Philip M. Meyers, John Pile‐Spellman, Sean D. Lavine, John O. Ward, Jon R. Snyder, Richard G. Brody, Wouter J. Hanegraaff and Albert Russell Ascoli. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Renaissance Quarterly, Italian Studies, MLN and Sixteenth Century Journal.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026