Peter Armour

428 citations
21 papers · 75 indexed · h-index 5

Impact in

  • Classics top 5%
    • Medieval Literature and History
    • Renaissance Literature and Culture
  • History top 5%
    • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies
    • Reformation and Early Modern Christianity

Papers in

    • Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 10
    • Byzantine Studies and History 2

Peter Armour

10 papers receiving 32 citations

Peers

Peter Armour
Comparison fields: 5 of 27
  • Classics 30
  • History 28
  • Literature and Literary Theory 29
  • Language and Linguistics 15
  • History and Philosophy of Science 6
Replace F. J. Furnivall with:
F. J. Furnivall
Anglicus Bartholomaeus
Sebastián Neumeister Germany
Boethius
William Calin United States
T. Gwynfor Griffith
Martin Camargo Russia
Helen Phillips United Kingdom
Robert L. Kindrick United States
Steven Botterill United Kingdom
Peter Armour relative to F. J. Furnivall F. J. Furnivall's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
F. J. Furnivall · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Peter Armour

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Peter Armour's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Peter Armour with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Peter Armour more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Peter Armour

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Peter Armour. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Peter Armour. The network helps show where Peter Armour may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Peter Armour, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Peter Armour Line = papers co-authored together Peter Armour links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20001
2 20004
3 200034
4 19971
5 19941
6 19943
7 19943
8 19933
9 19930
10 19926
11 19916
12 19880
13 19880
14 19860
15 19861
16 19853
17 19834
18 19830
19
Dante soundings : eight literary and historical essays
19811
20 19792

About Peter Armour

Peter Armour is a scholar working on History, Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, Anthropology and Archeology, having authored 21 papers that have together received 75 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (10 papers), Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Byzantine Studies and History (2 papers), Classical Philosophy and Thought (1 paper), Historical and Literary Analyses (1 paper), Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (1 paper), Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (1 paper) and Early Modern Spanish Literature (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (30 citations), History (28 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (29 citations), Language and Linguistics (15 citations) and History and Philosophy of Science (6 citations). Peter Armour has collaborated with scholars based in Italy. Frequent co-authors include Steven Botterill, Angus Mackay, Jane E. Everson, Peter Hainsworth, Vittorio Russo, Marilyn I Rob, Cecil H. Clough, Richard Mackenney, Jonathan C. Barnes and J. H. Whitfield. Their work appears in journals such as Italian Studies, The Modern Language Review, Australian Journal of Social Issues, Quaderni d italianistica and Romance Studies.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026