William Nelson

692 citations
30 papers · 219 · h-index 9

Impact in

Papers in

William Nelson

24 papers receiving 112 citations

Peers

William Nelson
Comparison fields: 5 of 63
  • Classics 19
  • Literature and Literary Theory 51
  • Philosophy 24
  • History 22
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 26
Replace Stephen Pender with:
Stephen Pender Ireland
John Ball United States
Jerome Friedman United States
Friedrich Meinecke Germany
Keith Sidwell Canada
Ashley Marshall United States
Virginia Cox United States
David M. Lewis United States
Ugo Bianchi Italy
Michael Warren United States
William Nelson relative to Stephen Pender Ireland Stephen Pender's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.3×
Stephen Pender · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by William Nelson

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of William Nelson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by William Nelson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites William Nelson more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by William Nelson

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by William Nelson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by William Nelson. The network helps show where William Nelson may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 8 scholars most cited alongside William Nelson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with William Nelson Line = papers co-authored together William Nelson links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 30 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 199846
2 197426
3 197521
4 196414
5
The Secular Scripture, A Study of the Structure of Romance by Northrop Frye (review)
197713
6 196411
7 198011
8 197710
9 20009
10
The Fourteenth Amendment
19887
11 19637
12 20087
13 20005
14
Documents Relating to the Colonial History of the State of New Jersey
20095
15 20084
16 19694
17 19573
18
Twentieth century interpretations of Utopia. : a collection of critical essays.
19683
19
Form and convention in the poetry of Edmund Spenser : selected papers from the English Institute
19612
20 20052

About William Nelson

William Nelson is a scholar working on Political Science and International Relations, Literature and Literary Theory, Philosophy, Sociology and Political Science and History, having authored 30 papers that have together received 219 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Political Philosophy and Ethics (5 papers), Poetry Analysis and Criticism (4 papers), Literature and Cultural Memory (3 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), American Constitutional Law and Politics (2 papers), Kierkegaardian Philosophy and Influence (2 papers), Ethics in medical practice (1 paper) and Short Stories in Global Literature (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (19 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (51 citations), Philosophy (24 citations), History (22 citations) and Pathology and Forensic Medicine (26 citations). William Nelson has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include David A. Galbraith, Edmund Spenser, Barbara Kiefer Lewalski, Rosalie L. Colie, Joan Grundy, William E. Nelson, Andrew Reed and A. Neil Barclay. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Ethics, Comparative Literature, ELH and Episteme.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact