Steven Botterill
Impact in
- Classics top 5%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Renaissance Literature and Culture
- General Arts and Humanities top 10%
Papers in
- Co-authors
- Peter Armour (4 shared papers)Alison Cornish (1 shared paper)Jane E. Everson (2 shared papers)Letizia Panizza (1 shared paper)Warren Ginsberg (1 shared paper)Jonathan D. Smith (1 shared paper)Peter Hainsworth (2 shared papers)C. P. Brand (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (4 papers)Italian Studies (4 papers)Philosophy and literature (1 paper)Forum Italicum A Journal of Italian Studies (1 paper)Italica (6 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited States
In The Last Decade
Steven Botterill
8 papers receiving 29 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Classics 32
- General Arts and Humanities 4
- History 32
- Literature and Literary Theory 26
- Language and Linguistics 11
Countries citing papers authored by Steven Botterill
This map shows the geographic impact of Steven Botterill's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Steven Botterill with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Steven Botterill more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Steven Botterill
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Steven Botterill. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Steven Botterill. The network helps show where Steven Botterill may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 16 scholars most cited alongside Steven Botterill, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2000 | 34 | |
| 2 | 1994 | 14 | |
| 3 | 1997 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 5 | 1985 | 3 | |
| 6 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 7 | 1985 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1988 | 2 | |
| 9 | 1996 | 1 | |
| 10 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 11 | 1999 | 1 | |
| 12 | 1991 | 1 | |
| 13 | 1987 | 0 | |
| 14 | 1999 | 0 | |
| 15 | 1998 | 0 | |
| 16 | 2001 | 0 | |
| 17 | 1988 | 0 | |
| 18 | 2001 | 0 |
About Steven Botterill
Steven Botterill is a scholar working on History, Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, Religious studies and Sociology and Political Science, having authored 18 papers that have together received 70 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (9 papers), Medieval Literature and History (5 papers), Medieval European Literature and History (2 papers), Comparative Literary Analysis and Criticism (2 papers), Historical, Literary, and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Early Modern Women Writers (2 papers), Early Modern Spanish Literature (2 papers) and Theology and Canon Law Studies (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (32 citations), General Arts and Humanities (4 citations), History (32 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (26 citations) and Language and Linguistics (11 citations). Steven Botterill has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and United States. Frequent co-authors include Peter Armour, Alison Cornish, Jane E. Everson, Letizia Panizza, Warren Ginsberg, Jonathan D. Smith, Peter Hainsworth, C. P. Brand, John C. Lindon and Peter Brand. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Italian Studies, Philosophy and literature, Forum Italicum A Journal of Italian Studies and Italica.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.