Sixteenth Century Journal

5.1k papers and 34.8k indexed citations i.

About

The 5.1k papers published in Sixteenth Century Journal in the last decades have received a total of 34.8k indexed citations. Papers published in Sixteenth Century Journal usually cover History (2.4k papers), Political Science and International Relations (778 papers) and Classics (692 papers) specifically the topics of Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (1.3k papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (355 papers) and Historical Influence and Diplomacy (341 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Sixteenth Century Journal are William E. Burns, Ronald H. Fritze, Robert C. Evans, John F. Schwaller, Stanford Lehmberg, Thomas Ertman, Jane Donawerth, Nicholas Terpstra, Thomas Mayer and Christiane L. Joost‐Gaugier.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Sixteenth Century Journal

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Sixteenth Century Journal. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Sixteenth Century Journal.

Countries where authors publish in Sixteenth Century Journal

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Sixteenth Century Journal. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Sixteenth Century Journal with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sixteenth Century Journal more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025