History
Impact in
- Classics 139.4k
- Medieval Literature and History
- Anthropology 233.9k
Also classified as
- Classics 65.9k
- Conservation 27.3k
History
20.4k papers receiving 51.3k citations
Countries where authors publish papers about History
This map shows the geographic impact of research in History. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers about History with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites History more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers about History
This network shows the impact of papers covering History. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers covering History.
About History
635.8k papers covering History have received a total of 2.5M indexed citations since 1950 . Papers on History are most often about the specific topic of Reformation and Early Modern Christianity, Historical and Archaeological Studies, Historical and Religious Studies of Rome, Libraries, Manuscripts, and Books, French Historical and Cultural Studies, European Political History Analysis, Historical Studies on Spain and Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis and also cover the fields of Classics, Conservation, History and Philosophy of Science, Archeology and Literature and Literary Theory. Papers citing work on History are usually about Classics, Anthropology, Political Science and International Relations, History and Philosophy of Science and Archeology. Some of the most active scholars covering History are Michel Foucault, Pierre Bourdıeu, Charles Tilly, Terence Ranger, Ann Laura Stoler, Eric Hobsbawm, Marianne Hirsch, Bruno Glaser, Robert C. Hastings and William M. Denevan.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.