Paul Fouracre
- Classics top 1%
- History top 1%
- Political Science and International Relations top 10%
- Anthropology top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Co-authors
- Wendy DaviesDavid GanzJanet L. NelsonMair ParryPhilip B. MorganJohn A. ScottJ.C. BarnesTrevor Dean
- Topics
- Medieval Literature and History (10 papers)Historical and Archaeological Studies (6 papers)Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesMexico
In The Last Decade
Paul Fouracre
18 papers receiving 136 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 26
- Classics 128
- History 123
- Political Science and International Relations 77
- Anthropology 29
- Sociology and Political Science 28
Countries citing papers authored by Paul Fouracre
This map shows the geographic impact of Paul Fouracre's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Paul Fouracre with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Paul Fouracre more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Paul Fouracre
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Paul Fouracre. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Paul Fouracre. The network helps show where Paul Fouracre may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Paul Fouracre
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Paul Fouracre. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Paul Fouracre based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Paul Fouracre. Paul Fouracre is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 3 | |
| 2 | 3 | |
| 3 | 0 | |
| 4 | 4 | |
| 5 | The Languages of Gift in the Early Middle Ages | 22 |
| 6 | Frankish History: Studies in the Construction of Power | 1 |
| 7 | 5 | |
| 8 | Frankland : the Franks and the world of the early middle ages : essays in honour of Dame Jinty Nelson | 10 |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | The New Cambridge Medieval History Vol 1 c.500-c.700 | 7 |
| 11 | 12 | |
| 12 | 0 | |
| 13 | 19 | |
| 14 | 7 | |
| 15 | 3 | |
| 16 | 21 | |
| 17 | 5 | |
| 18 | 79 | |
| 19 | 2 | |
| 20 | 1 |
About Paul Fouracre
Paul Fouracre is a scholar working on Classics, History and Archeology, having authored 20 papers that have together received 209 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Medieval Literature and History (10 papers), Historical and Archaeological Studies (6 papers) and Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (128 citations), History (123 citations) and Political Science and International Relations (77 citations). Paul Fouracre has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Mexico. Frequent co-authors include Wendy Davies, David Ganz, Janet L. Nelson, Mair Parry, Philip B. Morgan, John A. Scott, J.C. Barnes, Trevor Dean and Virginia Cox. Their work appears in journals such as Michigan Law Review, Past & Present and American Journal of Legal History.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.