Barbara Spackman
Impact in
- General Arts and Humanities top 2%
- Italian Literature and Culture
-
- Visual Culture and Art Theory
Papers in
-
- Italian Fascism and Post-war Society 9
- History 4
- Renaissance and Early Modern Studies 2
- French Historical and Cultural Studies 2
- Co-authors
- Richard Drake (1 shared paper)Albert Russell Ascoli (1 shared paper)Victoria Kahn (1 shared paper)John M. Najemy (1 shared paper)J. G. A. Pocock (1 shared paper)Ronald L. Martínez (1 shared paper)Virginia Cox (1 shared paper)Robert E. Black (1 shared paper)
- Journals
- Modernism/modernity (2 papers)MLN (1 paper)SubStance (1 paper)The Italianist (1 paper)Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United States
In The Last Decade
Barbara Spackman
12 papers receiving 92 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 40
- General Arts and Humanities 9
- Visual Arts and Performing Arts 23
- History 34
- Sociology and Political Science 96
- Music 6
Countries citing papers authored by Barbara Spackman
This map shows the geographic impact of Barbara Spackman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Barbara Spackman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Barbara Spackman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Barbara Spackman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Barbara Spackman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Barbara Spackman. The network helps show where Barbara Spackman may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 12 scholars most cited alongside Barbara Spackman, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1998 | 84 | |
| 2 | 1992 | 32 | |
| 3 | 2010 | 8 | |
| 4 | 2018 | 5 | |
| 5 | 1990 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2011 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2017 | 3 | |
| 8 | Accidental Orientalists: Modern Italian Travelers in Ottoman Lands | 2017 | 3 |
| 9 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2009 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2001 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2008 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2005 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2004 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1992 | 1 | |
| 16 | 1994 | 0 | |
| 17 | Hygiene in the Harem: The Orientalism of Cristina Trivulzio di Belgiojoso | 2017 | 0 |
About Barbara Spackman
Barbara Spackman is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, History, General Arts and Humanities, Political Science and International Relations and Dermatology, having authored 17 papers that have together received 155 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Italian Fascism and Post-war Society (9 papers), Italian Literature and Culture (3 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (2 papers), French Historical and Cultural Studies (2 papers), Diverse academic and cultural studies (1 paper), Psychoanalysis, Philosophy, and Politics (1 paper), Historical Studies and Socio-cultural Analysis (1 paper) and Translation Studies and Practices (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in General Arts and Humanities (9 citations), Visual Arts and Performing Arts (23 citations), History (34 citations), Sociology and Political Science (96 citations) and Music (6 citations). Barbara Spackman has collaborated with scholars based in United States. Frequent co-authors include Richard Drake, Albert Russell Ascoli, Victoria Kahn, John M. Najemy, J. G. A. Pocock, Ronald L. Martínez, Virginia Cox, Robert E. Black, Mikael Hörnqvist and Wayne A. Rebhorn. Their work appears in journals such as Modernism/modernity, MLN, SubStance, The Italianist and Tulsa Studies in Women s Literature.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.