Renaissance Quarterly

1.4k papers and 3.1k indexed citations i.

About

The 1.4k papers published in Renaissance Quarterly in the last decades have received a total of 3.1k indexed citations. Papers published in Renaissance Quarterly usually cover History (667 papers), Classics (274 papers) and Political Science and International Relations (188 papers) specifically the topics of Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (309 papers), Reformation and Early Modern Christianity (260 papers) and Renaissance Literature and Culture (150 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Renaissance Quarterly are G. W. Pigman, Katharine Park, Ronald G. Witt, John N. King, Will Fisher, Paula Findlen, Pamela H. Smith, John F. Padgett, Caroline Walker Bynum and David Quint.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Renaissance Quarterly

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Renaissance Quarterly. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Renaissance Quarterly.

Countries where authors publish in Renaissance Quarterly

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Renaissance Quarterly. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Renaissance Quarterly with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renaissance Quarterly more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025