Jane E. Everson
Impact in
- Classics top 10%
- Medieval Literature and History
- Renaissance Literature and Culture
- General Arts and Humanities top 10%
- Italian Literature and Culture
Papers in
- Classics 6
- Renaissance Literature and Culture 6
-
- Historical and Literary Analyses 5
- Co-authors
- Conor Fahy (1 shared paper)Peter Hainsworth (4 shared papers)Peter Armour (4 shared papers)Richard Mackenney (2 shared papers)David Robey (2 shared papers)Zygmunt G. Barański (2 shared papers)Steven Botterill (2 shared papers)Letizia Panizza (2 shared papers)
- Journals
- The Modern Language Review (7 papers)Italian Studies (4 papers)Renaissance Studies (1 paper)Quaderni d italianistica (1 paper)OpenEdition (OpenEdition) (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomFrance
In The Last Decade
Jane E. Everson
13 papers receiving 32 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 29
- Classics 19
- General Arts and Humanities 3
- History 22
- Literature and Literary Theory 14
- Language and Linguistics 9
Countries citing papers authored by Jane E. Everson
This map shows the geographic impact of Jane E. Everson's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Jane E. Everson with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Jane E. Everson more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Jane E. Everson
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Jane E. Everson. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Jane E. Everson. The network helps show where Jane E. Everson may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 18 scholars most cited alongside Jane E. Everson, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2001 | 13 | |
| 2 | 2003 | 4 | |
| 3 | 2018 | 4 | |
| 4 | 1996 | 4 | |
| 5 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 6 | 2016 | 3 | |
| 7 | 2011 | 3 | |
| 8 | 1993 | 3 | |
| 9 | 1994 | 3 | |
| 10 | 2008 | 3 | |
| 11 | 2000 | 2 | |
| 12 | 2005 | 2 | |
| 13 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 14 | 1986 | 1 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2014 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2011 | 0 | |
| 18 | 1993 | 0 |
About Jane E. Everson
Jane E. Everson is a scholar working on Classics, Literature and Literary Theory, History, Anthropology and Language and Linguistics, having authored 18 papers that have together received 50 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Renaissance Literature and Culture (6 papers), Renaissance and Early Modern Studies (5 papers), Historical and Literary Analyses (5 papers), Medieval European Literature and History (2 papers), Historical and Literary Studies (2 papers), Theatre and Performance Studies (1 paper), Cultural Studies and Interdisciplinary Research (1 paper) and Linguistic Studies and Language Acquisition (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Classics (19 citations), General Arts and Humanities (3 citations), History (22 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (14 citations) and Language and Linguistics (9 citations). Jane E. Everson has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom and France. Frequent co-authors include Conor Fahy, Peter Hainsworth, Peter Armour, Richard Mackenney, David Robey, Zygmunt G. Barański, Steven Botterill, Letizia Panizza, Cecil H. Clough and Jonathan D. Smith. Their work appears in journals such as The Modern Language Review, Italian Studies, Renaissance Studies, Quaderni d italianistica and OpenEdition (OpenEdition).
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.