Vera M. Schweitzer

667 total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 363 citations indexed

About

Vera M. Schweitzer is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Vera M. Schweitzer has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 363 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 3 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 3 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology and 2 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Vera M. Schweitzer's work include Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper) and Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (1 paper). Vera M. Schweitzer is often cited by papers focused on Delphi Technique in Research (2 papers), Knowledge Management and Sharing (1 paper) and Grit, Self-Efficacy, and Motivation (1 paper). Vera M. Schweitzer collaborates with scholars based in Germany, Netherlands and Ireland. Vera M. Schweitzer's co-authors include Nicolas Frevel, Heiko A. von der Gracht, Daniel Beiderbeck, Sascha L. Schmidt, Fabiola H. Gerpott, Wladislaw Rivkin, Julia Krasko, Maike Luhmann, Stefan Diestel and Mo Wang and has published in prestigious journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes and Work & Stress.

In The Last Decade

Vera M. Schweitzer

5 papers receiving 354 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements

2021 281 citations Daniel Beiderbeck, Nicolas Frevel et al. MethodsX profile →

Peers

Vera M. Schweitzer

SPS

GHP

EE

PHEOH

SP

Daniel Beiderbeck Germany

Nicolas Frevel Germany

Ian Belton United Kingdom

Anna Hoover United States

Carmel Maher Ireland

David L. Driscoll United States

Odd Einar Olsen Norway

Ferdous Jahan Bangladesh

Ho Ting Wong Hong Kong

Michael Charles United States

Daniel Beiderbeck Germany

Vera M. Schweitzer

192 ×1.1

SPS

41 ×1.0

GHP

52 ×1.3

EE

37 ×1.1

PHEOH

21 ×0.6

SP

Citations per year, relative to Vera M. Schweitzer Vera M. Schweitzer (= 1×) peers Daniel Beiderbeck

Countries citing papers authored by Vera M. Schweitzer

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Vera M. Schweitzer's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Vera M. Schweitzer with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Vera M. Schweitzer more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Vera M. Schweitzer

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Vera M. Schweitzer. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Vera M. Schweitzer. The network helps show where Vera M. Schweitzer may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Vera M. Schweitzer

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Vera M. Schweitzer. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Vera M. Schweitzer based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Vera M. Schweitzer. Vera M. Schweitzer is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Schweitzer, Vera M., et al.. (2025). Cracks in the Foundation: How Relational Communication Dynamics Predict Performance Improvement in Cross‐Functional Teams. Journal of Supply Chain Management. 61(3). 36–54.

2.

Schweitzer, Vera M., et al.. (2023). (Don’t) mind the gap? Information gaps compound curiosity yet also feed frustration at work. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes. 178. 104276–104276. 11 indexed citations

3.

Schweitzer, Vera M., Wladislaw Rivkin, Fabiola H. Gerpott, et al.. (2022). Some positivity per day can protect you a long way: A within-person field experiment to test an affect-resource model of employee effectiveness at work. Work & Stress. 37(4). 446–465. 8 indexed citations

4.

Beiderbeck, Daniel, Nicolas Frevel, Heiko A. von der Gracht, Sascha L. Schmidt, & Vera M. Schweitzer. (2021). Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements. MethodsX. 8. 101401–101401. 281 indexed citations breakdown →

5.

Beiderbeck, Daniel, Nicolas Frevel, Heiko A. von der Gracht, Sascha L. Schmidt, & Vera M. Schweitzer. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on the European football ecosystem – A Delphi-based scenario analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 165. 120577–120577. 54 indexed citations

6.

Krasko, Julia, Vera M. Schweitzer, & Maike Luhmann. (2020). Happiness Goal Orientations and their Associations with Well-Being. 4(2). 121–162. 9 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact