Nicolas Frevel

720 total citations · 1 hit paper
6 papers, 384 citations indexed

About

Nicolas Frevel is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Social Psychology and Strategy and Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Nicolas Frevel has authored 6 papers receiving a total of 384 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 1 paper in Social Psychology and 1 paper in Strategy and Management. Recurrent topics in Nicolas Frevel's work include Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers), Conferences and Exhibitions Management (3 papers) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (2 papers). Nicolas Frevel is often cited by papers focused on Delphi Technique in Research (4 papers), Conferences and Exhibitions Management (3 papers) and Sport and Mega-Event Impacts (2 papers). Nicolas Frevel collaborates with scholars based in Germany and Switzerland. Nicolas Frevel's co-authors include Daniel Beiderbeck, Sascha L. Schmidt, Heiko A. von der Gracht, Vera M. Schweitzer and Dominik Schreyer and has published in prestigious journals such as Technological Forecasting and Social Change, MethodsX and Applied Economics Letters.

In The Last Decade

Nicolas Frevel

6 papers receiving 375 citations

Hit Papers

align trajectories

What are hit papers?

Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research topics.

Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements

2021 281 citations Daniel Beiderbeck, Nicolas Frevel et al. MethodsX profile →

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Nicolas Frevel Germany	5	195	59	40	37	37	6	384
Daniel Beiderbeck Germany	6	192 1.0×	52 0.9×	41 1.0×	37 1.0×	29 0.8×	10	405
Vera M. Schweitzer Germany	5	175 0.9×	39 0.7×	42 1.1×	35 0.9×	18 0.5×	6	363
Ferdous Jahan Bangladesh	12	140 0.7×	41 0.7×	43 1.1×	27 0.7×	10 0.3×	62	413
Joseph A. Scarcella United States	2	146 0.7×	28 0.5×	45 1.1×	49 1.3×	8 0.2×	5	358
Ian Belton United Kingdom	8	195 1.0×	38 0.6×	39 1.0×	22 0.6×	7 0.2×	23	419
Benjamin Alamar United States	9	67 0.3×	125 2.1×	71 1.8×	54 1.5×	30 0.8×	24	461
Pablo Burillo Spain	15	107 0.5×	69 1.2×	18 0.5×	32 0.9×	43 1.2×	57	556
Renata Konrad United States	11	103 0.5×	81 1.4×	63 1.6×	20 0.5×	5 0.1×	37	445
Michael Z. Sincoff United States	7	159 0.8×	25 0.4×	22 0.6×	24 0.6×	29 0.8×	18	348
Yasser Bhatti United Kingdom	14	62 0.3×	125 2.1×	58 1.4×	88 2.4×	13 0.4×	31	703

Countries citing papers authored by Nicolas Frevel

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Nicolas Frevel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Nicolas Frevel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Nicolas Frevel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Nicolas Frevel

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Nicolas Frevel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Nicolas Frevel. The network helps show where Nicolas Frevel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Nicolas Frevel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Nicolas Frevel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Nicolas Frevel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Nicolas Frevel. Nicolas Frevel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

6 of 6 papers shown

1.

Frevel, Nicolas, Daniel Beiderbeck, & Sascha L. Schmidt. (2022). The impact of technology on sports – A prospective study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 182. 121838–121838. 27 indexed citations

2.

Beiderbeck, Daniel, et al.. (2022). The impact of technology on the future of football – A global Delphi study. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 187. 122186–122186. 10 indexed citations

3.

Beiderbeck, Daniel, Nicolas Frevel, Heiko A. von der Gracht, Sascha L. Schmidt, & Vera M. Schweitzer. (2021). Preparing, conducting, and analyzing Delphi surveys: Cross-disciplinary practices, new directions, and advancements. MethodsX. 8. 101401–101401. 281 indexed citations breakdown →

4.

Beiderbeck, Daniel, Nicolas Frevel, Heiko A. von der Gracht, Sascha L. Schmidt, & Vera M. Schweitzer. (2021). The impact of COVID-19 on the European football ecosystem – A Delphi-based scenario analysis. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 165. 120577–120577. 54 indexed citations

5.

Frevel, Nicolas, et al.. (2020). Die SportsTech Matrix – ein strukturierendes Element für eine aufstrebende Branche. Wirtschaftsinformatik & Management. 12(5). 332–341. 2 indexed citations

6.

Frevel, Nicolas & Dominik Schreyer. (2019). Behavioral responses to terrorist attacks: empirical evidence from professional football. Applied Economics Letters. 27(3). 244–247. 10 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact