Ian Belton

733 total citations · 1 hit paper
23 papers, 419 citations indexed

About

Ian Belton is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Management Science and Operations Research and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ian Belton has authored 23 papers receiving a total of 419 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 7 papers in Management Science and Operations Research and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ian Belton's work include Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (5 papers) and Forecasting Techniques and Applications (5 papers). Ian Belton is often cited by papers focused on Decision-Making and Behavioral Economics (6 papers), Delphi Technique in Research (5 papers) and Forecasting Techniques and Applications (5 papers). Ian Belton collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Australia and Canada. Ian Belton's co-authors include George Wright, Iain Hamlin, Mandeep K. Dhami, David R. Mandel, Jane Goodman‐Delahunty, Fergus Bolger, Dilek Önkal, James Carroll, Kerstin Cuhls and David McMillan and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Technological Forecasting and Social Change and International Journal of Forecasting.

In The Last Decade

Ian Belton

20 papers receiving 399 citations

Hit Papers

Improving the practical application of the Delphi method ... 2019 2026 2021 2023 2019 50 100 150 200 250

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ian Belton United Kingdom 8 195 54 47 39 38 23 419
Charles Lindsey United States 11 153 0.8× 34 0.6× 13 0.3× 22 0.6× 50 1.3× 23 496
Jon Barrutia Spain 8 131 0.7× 73 1.4× 26 0.6× 23 0.6× 37 1.0× 20 347
Tobias Gnatzy Germany 4 195 1.0× 88 1.6× 40 0.9× 12 0.3× 40 1.1× 5 418
Allison Stewart United Kingdom 8 92 0.5× 104 1.9× 169 3.6× 59 1.5× 41 1.1× 18 388
Tor‐Olav Nævestad Norway 19 153 0.8× 87 1.6× 31 0.7× 26 0.7× 27 0.7× 69 816
Ning Neil Yu China 12 105 0.5× 14 0.3× 35 0.7× 71 1.8× 193 5.1× 30 648
Penelope M. Mullen United Kingdom 8 206 1.1× 41 0.8× 91 1.9× 153 3.9× 143 3.8× 18 635
Fatih Demiroz United States 9 340 1.7× 53 1.0× 35 0.7× 46 1.2× 32 0.8× 15 534
Martin Read United Kingdom 11 53 0.3× 94 1.7× 98 2.1× 70 1.8× 22 0.6× 36 493
Sami A. Khan Saudi Arabia 12 228 1.2× 82 1.5× 22 0.5× 67 1.7× 74 1.9× 23 673

Countries citing papers authored by Ian Belton

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ian Belton's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ian Belton with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ian Belton more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ian Belton

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ian Belton. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ian Belton. The network helps show where Ian Belton may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ian Belton

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ian Belton. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ian Belton based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ian Belton. Ian Belton is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
2.
Dhami, Mandeep K., et al.. (2024). Effects of task structure and confirmation bias in alternative hypotheses evaluation. Cognitive Research Principles and Implications. 9(1). 37–37. 1 indexed citations
3.
Belton, Ian & Mandeep K. Dhami. (2024). The role of character‐based personal mitigation in sentencing judgments. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 21(1). 208–239. 3 indexed citations
4.
Derbyshire, James, Mandeep K. Dhami, Ian Belton, & Dilek Önkal. (2023). The value of experiments in futures and foresight science: A reply. Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London). 5(2).
5.
Bolger, Fergus, et al.. (2023). Virtuous opinion change in structured groups. Judgment and Decision Making. 18. 2 indexed citations
6.
Derbyshire, James, Mandeep K. Dhami, Ian Belton, & Dilek Önkal. (2022). The value of experiments in futures and foresight science as illustrated by the case of scenario planning. Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London). 5(2). 4 indexed citations
7.
Belton, Ian, Kerstin Cuhls, & George Wright. (2022). A critical evaluation of 42, large‐scale, science and technology foresight Delphi surveys. Publikationsdatenbank der Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft (Fraunhofer-Gesellschaft). 4(2). 7 indexed citations
8.
Belton, Ian, et al.. (2021). Delphi with feedback of rationales: How large can a Delphi group be such that participants are not overloaded, de-motivated, or disengaged?. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 170. 120897–120897. 23 indexed citations
9.
Dhami, Mandeep K., et al.. (2020). Disengaging and Rehabilitating High-Value Detainees: A Small-Scale Qualitative Study. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología.
10.
Bolger, Fergus, Ian Belton, Iain Hamlin, et al.. (2020). Improving the production and evaluation of structural models using a Delphi process. OSF Preprints (OSF Preprints). 1 indexed citations
11.
Bolger, Fergus, et al.. (2020). The Simulated Group Response Paradigm: A new approach to the study of opinion change in Delphi and other structured-group techniques. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 4 indexed citations
12.
Dhami, Mandeep K., Ian Belton, Elizabeth Merrall, Andrew McGrath, & Sheila M. Bird. (2020). Criminal Sentencing by Preferred Numbers. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 17(1). 139–163. 5 indexed citations
13.
Dhami, Mandeep K., et al.. (2019). Using scenarios to forecast outcomes of a refugee crisis. International Journal of Forecasting. 38(3). 1175–1184. 5 indexed citations
14.
Belton, Ian, et al.. (2019). Improving the practical application of the Delphi method in group-based judgment: A six-step prescription for a well-founded and defensible process. Technological Forecasting and Social Change. 147. 72–82. 279 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Dhami, Mandeep K. & Ian Belton. (2017). On getting inside the judge’s mind.. Translational Issues in Psychological Science. 3(2). 214–226. 15 indexed citations
16.
Dhami, Mandeep K. & Ian Belton. (2016). Statistical Analyses of Court Decisions: An Example of Multilevel Models of Sentencing. Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London). 8 indexed citations
17.
Dhami, Mandeep K., et al.. (2016). Critical Review of Analytic Techniques. Middlesex University Research Repository (Middlesex University Of London). 152–155. 6 indexed citations
18.
Dhami, Mandeep K., et al.. (2016). Critical Review of Analytic Techniques. 152–155. 5 indexed citations
19.
Belton, Ian, et al.. (2014). Lawyer and Nonlawyer Susceptibility to Framing Effects in Out‐of‐Court Civil Litigation Settlement. Journal of Empirical Legal Studies. 11(3). 578–600. 5 indexed citations
20.
Dhami, Mandeep K., Ian Belton, & Jane Goodman‐Delahunty. (2014). Quasirational models of sentencing.. Journal of Applied Research in Memory and Cognition. 4(3). 239–247. 14 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026