Ursula Christmann

676 total citations
38 papers, 353 citations indexed

About

Ursula Christmann is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Ursula Christmann has authored 38 papers receiving a total of 353 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 12 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, 12 papers in Language and Linguistics and 6 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Ursula Christmann's work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (9 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (9 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers). Ursula Christmann is often cited by papers focused on Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (9 papers), Linguistic research and analysis (9 papers) and Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (5 papers). Ursula Christmann collaborates with scholars based in Germany, United States and Austria. Ursula Christmann's co-authors include Norbert Groeben, Johannes Naumann, Tobias Richter, Christoph Mischo, Margrit Schreier, Lisa Scharrer, Veronika Lerche, Andreas Voß, Brigitte Scheele and Klaus Ring and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Scientific Data and Learning and Individual Differences.

In The Last Decade

Ursula Christmann

37 papers receiving 296 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ursula Christmann Germany 10 126 122 98 58 51 38 353
Ya‐Fen Lo United States 10 286 2.3× 100 0.8× 210 2.1× 70 1.2× 53 1.0× 19 555
Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh Jordan 12 93 0.7× 131 1.1× 93 0.9× 43 0.7× 220 4.3× 91 426
William A. Henk United States 10 260 2.1× 74 0.6× 263 2.7× 33 0.6× 51 1.0× 51 431
Larry L. Shirey United States 7 308 2.4× 194 1.6× 176 1.8× 48 0.8× 59 1.2× 8 516
Hooshang Khoshsima Iran 11 125 1.0× 57 0.5× 239 2.4× 71 1.2× 89 1.7× 73 452
Dingfang Shu China 8 60 0.5× 132 1.1× 152 1.6× 71 1.2× 117 2.3× 23 390
Afsheen Rezai Iran 13 170 1.3× 44 0.4× 216 2.2× 125 2.2× 77 1.5× 42 500
Aseel Zibin Jordan 12 66 0.5× 181 1.5× 38 0.4× 65 1.1× 186 3.6× 54 377
Barbara Shaffer United States 12 100 0.8× 65 0.5× 76 0.8× 75 1.3× 99 1.9× 21 357
László Vincze Finland 10 81 0.6× 58 0.5× 77 0.8× 138 2.4× 191 3.7× 35 415

Countries citing papers authored by Ursula Christmann

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ursula Christmann's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ursula Christmann with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ursula Christmann more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ursula Christmann

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ursula Christmann. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ursula Christmann. The network helps show where Ursula Christmann may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ursula Christmann

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ursula Christmann. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ursula Christmann based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ursula Christmann. Ursula Christmann is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Christmann, Ursula, et al.. (2023). Does metaphorical framing influence the decision-making process in a judicial conflict? An empirical study on the case of surrogates. Psychology of Language and Communication. 298–329.
2.
Christmann, Ursula, et al.. (2023). “Domestic Drama,” “Love Killing,” or “Murder”: Does the Framing of Femicides Affect Readers’ Emotional and Cognitive Responses to the Crime?. Violence Against Women. 30(10). 2609–2631. 2 indexed citations
3.
Roos, Yvo B.W.E.M., et al.. (2019). Development and Validation of an “Attitude toward Surrogacy Questionnaire” in a German Population. Journal für Kardiologie (Krause & Pachernegg GmbH). 16(1). 6–14. 2 indexed citations
4.
Lerche, Veronika, Ursula Christmann, & Andreas Voß. (2018). Impact of Context Information on Metaphor Elaboration. Experimental Psychology (formerly Zeitschrift für Experimentelle Psychologie). 65(6). 370–384. 11 indexed citations
5.
Christmann, Ursula, et al.. (2016). A German-language replication study analysing the role of figurative speech in reasoning. Scientific Data. 3(1). 160098–160098. 10 indexed citations
6.
Christmann, Ursula & Norbert Groeben. (2013). Psychologie des Lesens. 145–223. 11 indexed citations
7.
Christmann, Ursula, et al.. (2011). The aesthetic paradox in processing conventional and non-conventional metaphors. Kent Academic Repository (University of Kent). 1(2). 199–240. 6 indexed citations
8.
Artelt, Cordula, Nele McElvany, Ursula Christmann, et al.. (2005). Expertise – Förderung von Lesekompetenz. Max Planck Institute for Plasma Physics. 6 indexed citations
9.
Christmann, Ursula, et al.. (2002). Auf der suche nach einem geschlechtergerechten sprachgebrauch -Führt die ersetzung des generischen maskulinums zu einer beeinträchtigung von textqualitäten?: 2636. 112(2). 115–136. 4 indexed citations
10.
Mischo, Christoph, et al.. (2002). Konzeption und Evaluation eines Trainings zum Umgang mit unfairem Argumentieren in Organisationen. Zeitschrift für Arbeits- und Organisationspsychologie A&O. 46(3). 150–158. 5 indexed citations
11.
Christmann, Ursula, et al.. (2000). Hypertext: prototypische Merkmale und deren realisierung im Hypertext "Visuelle Wahrnehmung.". 2 indexed citations
12.
Christmann, Ursula & Christoph Mischo. (2000). The Efficacy of Communicative Fairness and Rhetorical Aesthetics in Contributions to Argumentation. Language and Speech. 43(3). 229–259. 8 indexed citations
13.
Christmann, Ursula, Norbert Groeben, & Margrit Schreier. (1999). Subjektive Theorien: Rekonstruktion und Dialog-Konsens. 18(1). 138–153. 4 indexed citations
14.
Christmann, Ursula, et al.. (1999). Entwicklung und erste Validierung einer Skala zur Erfassung der passiven argumentativ-rhetorischen Kompetenz. 20(4). 309–325. 7 indexed citations
15.
Groeben, Norbert & Ursula Christmann. (1996). Textverstehen und Textverständlichkeit aus sprach-/denkpsychologischer Sicht. MADOC (University of Mannheim). 2 indexed citations
16.
Christmann, Ursula & Norbert Groeben. (1996). Die Rezeption schriftlicher Texte. De Gruyter eBooks. 3 indexed citations
17.
Christmann, Ursula, Margrit Schreier, & Norbert Groeben. (1996). War das Absicht? Indikatoren subjektiver Intentionalitätszustände bei der ethischen Bewertung von Argumentationsbeiträgen. Zeitschrift für Literaturwissenschaft und Linguistik. 26(1). 70–113. 5 indexed citations
18.
Schreier, Margrit, Norbert Groeben, & Ursula Christmann. (1995). ?That's not fair!? argumentational integrity as an ethics of argumentative communication. Argumentation. 9(2). 267–289. 26 indexed citations
19.
Groeben, Norbert, et al.. (1993). Fairness beim Argumentieren Argumentationsintegrität als Wertkonzept einer Ethik der Kommunikation. PsyDok Dokumentenserver für die Psychologie (Leibniz-Zentrum für Psychologische Information und Dokumentation). 355–382. 5 indexed citations
20.
Schreier, Margrit, et al.. (1993). Indicators of argumentational integrity in everyday communication. Argumentation. 7(2). 205–219. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ya‐Fen Lo Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Abdel Rahman Mitib Altakhaineh Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by William A. Henk Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Larry L. Shirey Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Hooshang Khoshsima Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Dingfang Shu Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Afsheen Rezai Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Aseel Zibin Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Barbara Shaffer Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by László Vincze
Rankless by CCL
2026