Violence Against Women

2.6k papers and 67.6k indexed citations i.

About

The 2.6k papers published in Violence Against Women in the last decades have received a total of 67.6k indexed citations. Papers published in Violence Against Women usually cover Health (1.7k papers), Sociology and Political Science (1.4k papers) and Gender Studies (1.2k papers) specifically the topics of Intimate Partner and Family Violence (1.7k papers), Sexual Assault and Victimization Studies (901 papers) and Sex work and related issues (557 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Violence Against Women are Lori Heise, Michael P. Johnson, Murray A. Straus, Jeffrey L.Edleson, Michael S. Kimmel, Richard M. Tolman, Nancy Thoennes, Lisa A. Goodman, Patricia Tjaden and Jacquelyn C. Campbell.

In The Last Decade

Fields of papers published in Violence Against Women

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers published in Violence Against Women. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Violence Against Women.

Countries where authors publish in Violence Against Women

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Violence Against Women. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Violence Against Women with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Violence Against Women more than expected).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar’s output or impact.

Explore journals with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2025