Umar Farooq
Impact in
- Biochemistry top 5%
- Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities
- Antioxidant Activity and Oxidative Stress
- Food Science top 10%
- Essential Oils and Antimicrobial Activity
Papers in
-
- Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems 3
-
- Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits 2
- Co-authors
- Kashif Akram (9 shared papers)Afshan Shafi (7 shared papers)Farzana Siddique (2 shared papers)Zafar Hayat (4 shared papers)Tusneem Kausar (1 shared paper)Shazia Yaqub (2 shared papers)Mian Anjum Murtaza (2 shared papers)Hafeez ur Rehman (5 shared papers)
- Journals
- Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition (2 papers)Trends in Food Science & Technology (1 paper)Journal of Food Processing and Preservation (1 paper)PLoS ONE (1 paper)Food Reviews International (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- PakistanSaudi ArabiaFrance
In The Last Decade
Umar Farooq
15 papers receiving 298 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 74
- Biochemistry 125
- Food Science 107
- Complementary and alternative medicine 38
- Nutrition and Dietetics 50
- Plant Science 89
Countries citing papers authored by Umar Farooq
This map shows the geographic impact of Umar Farooq's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Umar Farooq with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Umar Farooq more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Umar Farooq
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Umar Farooq. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Umar Farooq. The network helps show where Umar Farooq may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Umar Farooq, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2016 | 86 | |
| 2 | 2016 | 83 | |
| 3 | 2013 | 45 | |
| 4 | 2015 | 32 | |
| 5 | 2014 | 28 | |
| 6 | 2014 | 13 | |
| 7 | 2015 | 6 | |
| 8 | 2022 | 4 | |
| 9 | 2025 | 2 | |
| 10 | 2016 | 2 | |
| 11 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 12 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 13 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 14 | 2025 | 1 | |
| 15 | 2015 | 1 | |
| 16 | 2023 | 0 | |
| 17 | 2025 | 0 |
About Umar Farooq
Umar Farooq is a scholar working on Computational Theory and Mathematics, Nutrition and Dietetics, Biochemistry, Food Science and Plant Science, having authored 17 papers that have together received 306 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Phytochemicals and Antioxidant Activities (4 papers), Graph Labeling and Dimension Problems (3 papers), Plant Physiology and Cultivation Studies (2 papers), Mangiferin and Mango Extracts (2 papers), Botanical Research and Applications (2 papers), Psidium guajava Extracts and Applications (2 papers), Pomegranate: compositions and health benefits (2 papers) and Polysaccharides Composition and Applications (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biochemistry (125 citations), Food Science (107 citations), Complementary and alternative medicine (38 citations), Nutrition and Dietetics (50 citations) and Plant Science (89 citations). Umar Farooq has collaborated with scholars based in Pakistan, Saudi Arabia and France. Frequent co-authors include Kashif Akram, Afshan Shafi, Farzana Siddique, Zafar Hayat, Tusneem Kausar, Shazia Yaqub, Mian Anjum Murtaza, Hafeez ur Rehman, Asif Ahmad and Zulfiqar Ahmad. Their work appears in journals such as Critical Reviews in Food Science and Nutrition, Trends in Food Science & Technology, Journal of Food Processing and Preservation, PLoS ONE and Food Reviews International.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.