Trey Ideker
Impact in
- Molecular Biology top 0.01%
- Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks
- Gene expression and cancer classification
- Gene Regulatory Network Analysis
- Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction
- Epigenetics and DNA Methylation
- RNA modifications and cancer
- Aging top 0.1%
Papers in
- Aging 6
- Biophysics 18
- Co-authors
- Owen OzierBenno SchwikowskiNitin S. BaligaPaul ShannonNada AminDaniel RamageKeiichiro OnoPengliang Wang
- Journals
- Bioinformatics (17 papers)Molecular Cell (14 papers)Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences (9 papers)Genome biology (8 papers)Cell Systems (8 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesIsraelGermany
In The Last Decade
Trey Ideker
242 papers receiving 65.9k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 224
- Molecular Biology 46.8k
- Aging 1.0k
- Cancer Research 8.2k
- Computational Theory and Mathematics 5.0k
- Genetics 6.4k
Countries citing papers authored by Trey Ideker
This map shows the geographic impact of Trey Ideker's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Trey Ideker with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Trey Ideker more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Trey Ideker
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Trey Ideker. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Trey Ideker. The network helps show where Trey Ideker may publish in the future.
Co-authors
The 25 scholars most cited alongside Trey Ideker, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 20 | |
| 3 | 2024 | 15 | |
| 4 | 2024 | 38 | |
| 5 | 2023 | 5 | |
| 6 | 2023 | 24 | |
| 7 | 2022 | 110 | |
| 8 | 2021 | 55 | |
| 9 | 2020 | 12 | |
| 10 | Predicting Drug Response and Synergy Using a Deep Learning Model of Human Cancer Cells Hit paper breakdown → | 2020 | 285 |
| 11 | 2018 | 50 | |
| 12 | 2018 | 26 | |
| 13 | 2018 | 63 | |
| 14 | 2017 | 87 | |
| 15 | 2017 | 38 | |
| 16 | 2016 | 29 | |
| 17 | 2015 | 15 | |
| 18 | 2009 | 129 | |
| 19 | 2008 | 49 | |
| 20 | Conserved patterns of protein interaction in multiple species Hit paper breakdown → | 2005 | 507 |
About Trey Ideker
Trey Ideker is a scholar working on Aging, Biophysics, Molecular Biology, Cancer Research and Computational Theory and Mathematics, having authored 246 papers that have together received 66.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Bioinformatics and Genomic Networks (106 papers), Gene Regulatory Network Analysis (36 papers), Microbial Metabolic Engineering and Bioproduction (33 papers), Fungal and yeast genetics research (31 papers), Gene expression and cancer classification (26 papers), Cancer Genomics and Diagnostics (25 papers), Computational Drug Discovery Methods (25 papers) and Genomics and Chromatin Dynamics (21 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Molecular Biology (46.8k citations), Aging (1.0k citations), Cancer Research (8.2k citations), Computational Theory and Mathematics (5.0k citations) and Genetics (6.4k citations). Trey Ideker has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Israel and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Owen Ozier, Benno Schwikowski, Nitin S. Baliga, Paul Shannon, Nada Amin, Daniel Ramage, Keiichiro Ono, Pengliang Wang, Roded Sharan and Michael Smoot. Their work appears in journals such as Bioinformatics, Molecular Cell, Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, Genome biology and Cell Systems.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.