Tina Dacin
- Strategy and Management top 10%
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management top 10%
- Sociology and Political Science
- Accounting top 10%
- Management of Technology and Innovation top 10%
- Co-authors
- Terry L. AmburgeyPamela R. MurphyD. James CooperDonald PalmerJulie BattilanaChristian SeelosJohanna MairAndrew Delios
- Topics
- Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers)Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers)Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers)
- Cited by
- Business and International ManagementOrganizational Behavior and Human Resource ManagementManagement of Technology and Innovation
- Journals
- Academy of Management JournalJournal of Business EthicsAccounting Organizations and Society
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesIsrael
In The Last Decade
Tina Dacin
12 papers receiving 214 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 45
- Strategy and Management 94
- Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 80
- Sociology and Political Science 64
- Accounting 60
- Management of Technology and Innovation 47
Countries citing papers authored by Tina Dacin
This map shows the geographic impact of Tina Dacin's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tina Dacin with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tina Dacin more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tina Dacin
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tina Dacin. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tina Dacin. The network helps show where Tina Dacin may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tina Dacin
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tina Dacin. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tina Dacin based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Tina Dacin. Tina Dacin is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 1 | |
| 2 | 1 | |
| 3 | 1 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 27 | |
| 6 | 1 | |
| 7 | 33 | |
| 8 | 33 | |
| 9 | 8 | |
| 10 | 2 | |
| 11 | 117 | |
| 12 | 13 |
About Tina Dacin
Tina Dacin is a scholar working on Business and International Management, Strategy and Management and Public Administration, having authored 12 papers that have together received 238 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Management and Organizational Studies (3 papers), Innovation and Knowledge Management (3 papers) and Ethics in Business and Education (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Business and International Management (16 citations), Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (80 citations) and Management of Technology and Innovation (47 citations). Tina Dacin has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and Israel. Frequent co-authors include Terry L. Amburgey, Pamela R. Murphy, D. James Cooper, Donald Palmer, Julie Battilana, Christian Seelos, Johanna Mair, Andrew Delios, Michael A. Hitt and A. Wren Montgomery. Their work appears in journals such as Academy of Management Journal, Journal of Business Ethics and Accounting Organizations and Society.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.