Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
2 How Actors Change Institutions: Towards a Theory of Institutional Entrepreneurship
20091.1k citationsJulie Battilana, Bernard Léca et al.profile →
Institutional Work
2009489 citationsThomas B. Lawrence, Julie Battilana et al.Cambridge University Press eBooksprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
This map shows the geographic impact of Eva Boxenbaum's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Eva Boxenbaum with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Eva Boxenbaum more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Eva Boxenbaum. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Eva Boxenbaum. The network helps show where Eva Boxenbaum may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Eva Boxenbaum
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Eva Boxenbaum.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Eva Boxenbaum based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Eva Boxenbaum. Eva Boxenbaum is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Kokshagina, Olga, et al.. (2015). A Process of Collective Bricolage:Crafting Highly Diffusable Innovations in Contexts Of High Uncertainty. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School).1 indexed citations
Boxenbaum, Eva, et al.. (2014). Policy Making as Bricolage:The Role of Platforms in Institutional Innovation. CBS Research Portal (Copenhagen Business School).4 indexed citations
Acquier, Aurélien, et al.. (2011). Standards and Innovation in Emerging Fields: Pushing Breakthrough Innovation or Enrolling Actors?: An Analysis of Eco-District Standards in France and Denmark. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1–33.1 indexed citations
Boxenbaum, Eva, et al.. (2010). INNOVATION IN SUSTAINABLE CONSTRUCTION: ECO-CITIES AND SOCIAL HOUSING IN FRANCE AND DENMARK. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics. 1–50.1 indexed citations
14.
Battilana, Julie, Bernard Léca, & Eva Boxenbaum. (2009). Agency and Institutions: A Review on Institutional Entrepreneurship. HAL (Le Centre pour la Communication Scientifique Directe).108 indexed citations
15.
Lawrence, Thomas B., Julie Battilana, Matthew S. Kraatz, et al.. (2009). Institutional Work. Cambridge University Press eBooks.489 indexed citations breakdown →
Boxenbaum, Eva. (2004). INSTITUTIONAL INNOVATION: The emergence of a proto-institution.3 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.