Thomas J. Kane
About
In The Last Decade
Thomas J. Kane
96 papers receiving 4.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 126
- Education 3.7k
- Economics and Econometrics 1.5k
- Sociology and Political Science 1.1k
- Information Systems and Management 497
- Gender Studies 452
Countries citing papers authored by Thomas J. Kane
This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas J. Kane's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas J. Kane with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas J. Kane more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas J. Kane
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas J. Kane. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas J. Kane. The network helps show where Thomas J. Kane may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas J. Kane
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas J. Kane. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas J. Kane based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas J. Kane. Thomas J. Kane is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Connecting to Practice. | 3 |
| 2 | Validating Components of Teacher Effectiveness: A Random Assignment Study of Value-Added, Observation, and Survey Scores. | 1 |
| 3 | Capturing the Dimensions of Effective Teaching. | 6 |
| 4 | Capturing the Dimensions of Effective Teaching: Student Achievement Gains, Student Surveys, and Classroom Observations | 0 |
| 5 | Evaluating teacher effectiveness: can classroom observations identify practices that raise achievement? | 20 |
| 6 | Does Practice-Based Teacher Preparation Increase Student Achievement? Early Evidence from the Boston Teacher Residency. NBER Working Paper No. 17646. | 1 |
| 7 | School Choice, School Quality and Postsecondary Attainment. NBER Working Paper No. 17438. | 16 |
| 8 | Information and Employee Evaluation: Evidence from a Randomized Intervention in Public Schools. NBER Working Paper No. 16240. | 12 |
| 9 | Identifying Effective Classroom Practices Using Student Achievement Data. NBER Working Paper No. 15803. | 18 |
| 10 | Who Benefits from KIPP? NBER Working Paper No. 15740. | 17 |
| 11 | 9 | |
| 12 | Accountability and Flexibility in Public Schools: Evidence from Boston's Charters and Pilots. NBER Working Paper No. 15549. | 13 |
| 13 | National Board Certification and Teacher Effectiveness: Evidence from a Random Assignment Experiment. NBER Working Paper No. 14608. | 12 |
| 14 | Estimating Teacher Impacts on Student Achievement: An Experimental Evaluation. NBER Working Paper No. 14607. | 160 |
| 15 | Preferences and Heterogeneous Treatment Effects in a Public School Choice Lottery | 19 |
| 16 | College Cost, Borrowing Constraints and the Timing of College Entry | 35 |
| 17 | Labor-Market Returns to Two- and Four-Year College | 484 |
| 18 | Is the German Apprenticeship System a Panacea for the Us Labour Market | 46 |
| 19 | Labor Market Returns to Two- and Four-Year Colleges: Is a Credit a Credit and Do Degrees Matter? | 50 |
| 20 | The Parents' Institute: Helping Parents Understand Their Early Adolescent. | 2 |
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.