Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Citation Frequency and the Value of Patented Inventions
Countries citing papers authored by Dietmar Harhoff
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Dietmar Harhoff's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Dietmar Harhoff with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Dietmar Harhoff more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Dietmar Harhoff. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Dietmar Harhoff. The network helps show where Dietmar Harhoff may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Dietmar Harhoff
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Dietmar Harhoff.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Dietmar Harhoff based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Dietmar Harhoff. Dietmar Harhoff is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Bender, Stefan, et al.. (2014). The MPI-IC-IAB-Inventor data 2002 (MIID 2002): Record-linkage of patent register data with labor market biography data of the IAB. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Harhoff, Dietmar, et al.. (2013). Innovationen auf Bestellung? Was von einer stärkeren Nachfrageorientierung in der Innovationspolitik zu halten ist. Econstor (Econstor). 66(5). 3–19.1 indexed citations
12.
Gambardella, Alfonso, Dietmar Harhoff, & Bart Verspagen. (2008). The value of European patents. European Management Review. 5(2). 69–84.26 indexed citations
13.
Harhoff, Dietmar, et al.. (2008). THE ROLE OF PATENTS FOR VC FINANCING. SSRN Electronic Journal. 28(3). 2.3 indexed citations
14.
Giuri, Paola, Myriam Mariani, Stefano Brusoni, et al.. (2005). Everything you Always Wanted to Know about Inventors (but Never Asked): Evidence from the PatVal-EU Survey. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.33 indexed citations
15.
Gruber, Marc, Nikolaus Franke, Dietmar Harhoff, & Joachim Henkel. (2003). What you are is what you like - similarity biases in venture capitalists evaluations of start-up teams. Infoscience (Ecole Polytechnique Fédérale de Lausanne).2 indexed citations
16.
Harhoff, Dietmar. (2002). R&D Spillovers, Technological Proximity, and Productivity Growth - Evidencs from German Panel Data. SSRN Electronic Journal.2 indexed citations
Woywode, Michael, Dietmar Harhoff, & Konrad Stahl. (1996). Legal Form, Growth and Exit of West German Firms: Empirical Results for Manufacturing, Construction, Trade and Service Industries. SSRN Electronic Journal.26 indexed citations
19.
Harhoff, Dietmar & Thomas J. Kane. (1995). Is the German Apprenticeship System a Panacea for the Us Labour Market. Econstor (Econstor).46 indexed citations
20.
Harhoff, Dietmar. (1994). Zur steuerlichen Behandlung von Forschungs- und Entwicklungsaufwendungen: Eine internationale Bestandsaufnahme. RePEc: Research Papers in Economics.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.