Thomas Force

25.2k citations
158 papers · 16.8k indexed · 7 hit papers · h-index 67

Thomas Force

158 papers receiving 16.5k citations

Hit Papers

Heart Failure: Preventing Dis...9361992202620032014250500750

Peers

Thomas Force
Comparison fields: 5 of 158
  • Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 6.5k
  • Molecular Biology 8.9k
  • Oncology 3.2k
  • Hematology 900
  • Pathology and Forensic Medicine 1.4k
Replace Edward T.H. Yeh with:
Edward T.H. Yeh United States
James K. Liao United States
Masatsugu Hori Japan
Raymond C. Harris United States
George L. King United States
Tsutomu Imaizumi Japan
Johann Bauersachs Germany
Robert E. Gerszten United States
Gavin Y. Oudit Canada
Bradford C. Berk United States
Thomas Force relative to Edward T.H. Yeh United States Edward T.H. Yeh's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.7×
Edward T.H. Yeh · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas Force

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas Force's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas Force with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas Force more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas Force

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas Force. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas Force. The network helps show where Thomas Force may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Thomas Force, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Thomas Force Line = papers co-authored together Thomas Force links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 201931
2 2014146
3
TNNI3K, a novel cardiac-specific kinase, emerging as a molecular target for the treatment of cardiac disease
20142
4 201414
5 201347
6 20124
7 2011278
8 201098
9 20102
10 200843
11 200740
12 200644
13 200684
14
Cardiotoxicity of the cancer therapeutic agent imatinib mesylatebreakdown →
2006858
15 2005106
16 20053
17 2004190
18 20041
19 200042
20 199739

About Thomas Force

Thomas Force is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Molecular Biology and Hematology, having authored 158 papers that have together received 16.8k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Fibrosis and Remodeling (27 papers), Signaling Pathways in Disease (23 papers), Chemotherapy-induced cardiotoxicity and mitigation (23 papers), Cardiac electrophysiology and arrhythmias (20 papers), Protein Kinase Regulation and GTPase Signaling (16 papers), Melanoma and MAPK Pathways (14 papers), Wnt/β-catenin signaling in development and cancer (14 papers) and PI3K/AKT/mTOR signaling in cancer (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (6.5k citations), Molecular Biology (8.9k citations) and Oncology (3.2k citations). Thomas Force has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Joseph V. Bonventre, Risto Kerkelä, John Kyriakis, James R. Woodgett, Richard A. Van Etten, Gerald W. Dorn, Anthony Rosenzweig, Roger J. Hajjar, Syed Haq and Daniela S. Krause. Their work appears in journals such as Circulation, Journal of Biological Chemistry, Circulation Research, Molecular and Cellular Biology and Journal of Clinical Investigation.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026