W. David Merryman
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine top 1%
- Surgery top 5%
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine top 5%
- Biomaterials top 2%
- Co-authors
- Michael S. SacksJoshua D. HutchesonDavid E. SchmidtAlison K. SchroerVincent SetolaJoseph ChenLarisa RyzhovaRichard A. Hopkins
- Topics
- Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (44 papers)Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (14 papers)Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (12 papers)
- Partner nations
- United StatesCanadaAustralia
In The Last Decade
W. David Merryman
86 papers receiving 3.3k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 123
- Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine 1.8k
- Surgery 1.0k
- Molecular Biology 695
- Pulmonary and Respiratory Medicine 649
- Biomaterials 631
Countries citing papers authored by W. David Merryman
This map shows the geographic impact of W. David Merryman's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by W. David Merryman with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites W. David Merryman more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by W. David Merryman
This network shows the impact of papers produced by W. David Merryman. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by W. David Merryman. The network helps show where W. David Merryman may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of W. David Merryman
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of W. David Merryman. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of W. David Merryman based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with W. David Merryman. W. David Merryman is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 5 | |
| 3 | 34 | |
| 4 | 6 | |
| 5 | 8 | |
| 6 | 42 | |
| 7 | 10 | |
| 8 | 52 | |
| 9 | 37 | |
| 10 | 13 | |
| 11 | 31 | |
| 12 | 18 | |
| 13 | 43 | |
| 14 | 112 | |
| 15 | 1 | |
| 16 | 18 | |
| 17 | 82 | |
| 18 | 88 | |
| 19 | 95 | |
| 20 | 65 |
About W. David Merryman
W. David Merryman is a scholar working on Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine, Immunology and Allergy and Health Informatics, having authored 87 papers that have together received 3.4k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Cardiac Valve Diseases and Treatments (44 papers), Cardiomyopathy and Myosin Studies (14 papers) and Aortic Disease and Treatment Approaches (12 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cardiology and Cardiovascular Medicine (1.8k citations), Biomaterials (631 citations) and Immunology and Allergy (168 citations). W. David Merryman has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Canada and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Michael S. Sacks, Joshua D. Hutcheson, David E. Schmidt, Alison K. Schroer, Vincent Setola, Joseph Chen, Larisa Ryzhova, Richard A. Hopkins, Frederick J. Schoen and Mary Kathryn Sewell-Loftin. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Biological Chemistry, Circulation and Journal of Clinical Investigation.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.