Thomas F. Hawk

23 total papers · 1.2k total citations
15 papers, 724 citations indexed

About

Thomas F. Hawk is a scholar working on Education, Social Psychology and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Thomas F. Hawk has authored 15 papers receiving a total of 724 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 7 papers in Education, 4 papers in Social Psychology and 4 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Thomas F. Hawk's work include Communication in Education and Healthcare (4 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (4 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (3 papers). Thomas F. Hawk is often cited by papers focused on Communication in Education and Healthcare (4 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (4 papers) and Student Assessment and Feedback (3 papers). Thomas F. Hawk collaborates with scholars based in United States. Thomas F. Hawk's co-authors include Amit Shah, Paul Lyons and Dale E. Zand and has published in prestigious journals such as Academy of Management Learning and Education, The Journal of Applied Behavioral Science and Organizational Behavior Teaching Review.

In The Last Decade

Thomas F. Hawk

13 papers receiving 642 citations

Author Peers

Peers are selected by citation overlap in the author's most active subfields. citations · hero ref

Author Last Decade Papers Cites
Thomas F. Hawk 430 272 84 77 66 15 724
Thomas Howard Morris 464 1.1× 220 0.8× 104 1.2× 65 0.8× 59 0.9× 27 850
Elisabeth Dunne 556 1.3× 145 0.5× 49 0.6× 72 0.9× 39 0.6× 21 748
Barbara Gross Davis 534 1.2× 171 0.6× 68 0.8× 93 1.2× 45 0.7× 19 867
Lesley Willcoxson 389 0.9× 120 0.4× 41 0.5× 107 1.4× 79 1.2× 20 644
Karl Smith 487 1.1× 327 1.2× 61 0.7× 120 1.6× 30 0.5× 45 851
Najmuddin Shaik 493 1.1× 215 0.8× 178 2.1× 85 1.1× 31 0.5× 12 712
Mary E. Huba 596 1.4× 131 0.5× 50 0.6× 75 1.0× 40 0.6× 32 892
Nilda Palma‐Rivas 348 0.8× 134 0.5× 91 1.1× 77 1.0× 31 0.5× 9 692
Diane P. Janes 572 1.3× 104 0.4× 74 0.9× 47 0.6× 35 0.5× 12 896
Kenneth J. Chapman 301 0.7× 130 0.5× 43 0.5× 168 2.2× 169 2.6× 16 908

Countries citing papers authored by Thomas F. Hawk

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Thomas F. Hawk's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Thomas F. Hawk with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Thomas F. Hawk more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Thomas F. Hawk

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Thomas F. Hawk. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Thomas F. Hawk. The network helps show where Thomas F. Hawk may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Thomas F. Hawk

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Thomas F. Hawk. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Thomas F. Hawk based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Thomas F. Hawk. Thomas F. Hawk is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Loading papers...

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026