Ted Sanders

6.2k citations
133 papers · 3.3k · h-index 30

Impact in

Papers in

Ted Sanders

124 papers receiving 3.0k citations

Peers

Ted Sanders
Comparison fields: 5 of 87
  • Language and Linguistics 1.4k
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 1.1k
  • Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 1.1k
  • Literature and Literary Theory 729
  • Linguistics and Language 162
Replace Alison Wray with:
Alison Wray United Kingdom
Wolfgang U. Dressler Austria
Roger J. Kreuz United States
John J. Staczek United States
Paul Meara United Kingdom
Marjolijn Verspoor Netherlands
Lynne Cameron United Kingdom
Mirosław Pawlak Poland
Susan Hunston United Kingdom
Scott Jarvis United States
Ted Sanders relative to Alison Wray United Kingdom Alison Wray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×1.6×
Alison Wray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Ted Sanders

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ted Sanders's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ted Sanders with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ted Sanders more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ted Sanders

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ted Sanders. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ted Sanders. The network helps show where Ted Sanders may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 25 scholars most cited alongside Ted Sanders, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Ted Sanders Line = papers co-authored together Ted Sanders links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown

Showing the 20 most-cited of 133 papers — load more, or switch the sort, to bring in the rest.

#Work
1 1992437
2 2000259
3 2012174
4 1998168
5 1993147
6 2009116
7 1997111
8 200288
9 201282
10 200870
11 201465
12 200864
13 200859
14 201258
15 201450
16 201146
17 201744
18 201444
19 200943
20 201142

About Ted Sanders

Ted Sanders is a scholar working on Experimental and Cognitive Psychology, Language and Linguistics, Artificial Intelligence, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Cognitive Neuroscience, having authored 133 papers that have together received 3.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Language, Metaphor, and Cognition (45 papers), Language, Discourse, Communication Strategies (26 papers), Neurobiology of Language and Bilingualism (23 papers), Reading and Literacy Development (21 papers), Natural Language Processing Techniques (21 papers), Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (17 papers), Speech and dialogue systems (15 papers) and Text Readability and Simplification (14 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Language and Linguistics (1.4k citations), Developmental and Educational Psychology (1.1k citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (1.1k citations), Literature and Literary Theory (729 citations) and Linguistics and Language (162 citations). Ted Sanders has collaborated with scholars based in Netherlands, Germany and China. Frequent co-authors include L.G.M. Noordman, Wilbert Spooren, Jacqueline Evers-Vermeul, Huub van den Bergh, Alistair Knott, Willem M. Mak, Liesbeth Degand, Hugo Quené, Nivja H. de Jong and Hans Rutger Bosker. Their work appears in journals such as Discourse Processes, Journal of Pragmatics, Language Testing, Linguistics and Cognitive Linguistics.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact