Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales: A Meta-Analytic Review of Platform, Product, and Metric Factors
2015768 citationsAna Babić Rosario, Francesca Sotgiu et al.Journal of Marketing Researchprofile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Tammo H.A. Bijmolt
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Tammo H.A. Bijmolt's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Tammo H.A. Bijmolt with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Tammo H.A. Bijmolt more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Tammo H.A. Bijmolt
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Tammo H.A. Bijmolt. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Tammo H.A. Bijmolt. The network helps show where Tammo H.A. Bijmolt may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Tammo H.A. Bijmolt
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Tammo H.A. Bijmolt.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Tammo H.A. Bijmolt based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Tammo H.A. Bijmolt. Tammo H.A. Bijmolt is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Hoekstra, Janny, et al.. (2015). PROVIDING INFORMATION AND ENABLING TRANSACTIONS: WHICH WEBSITE FUNCTION IS MORE IMPORTANT FOR SUCCESS?. Journal of electronic commerce research. 16(2). 81–94.9 indexed citations
9.
Rosario, Ana Babić, Francesca Sotgiu, Kristine De Valck, & Tammo H.A. Bijmolt. (2015). The Effect of Electronic Word of Mouth on Sales: A Meta-Analytic Review of Platform, Product, and Metric Factors. Journal of Marketing Research. 53(3). 297–318.768 indexed citations breakdown →
Osselaer, Stijn M. J. van, et al.. (2010). Are women more loyal customers than men. 3(2). 10–11.5 indexed citations
15.
Clément, Michel, et al.. (2010). Should they stay or should they go? Reactivation and termination of low-tier customers: Effects on satisfaction, word-of-mouth, and purchases. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 10008.3 indexed citations
16.
Paas, Leonard J., Jeroen K. Vermunt, & Tammo H.A. Bijmolt. (2007). Discrete-time discrete-state latent Markov modelling for assessing and predicting household acquisitions of financial products. Tilburg University Research Portal.1 indexed citations
17.
Leeflang, Peter S. H., Peter C. Verhoef, & Tammo H.A. Bijmolt. (2006). Trends in marketing en wetenschap. Data Archiving and Networked Services (DANS). 40(9). 92–94.1 indexed citations
18.
Bijmolt, Tammo H.A., et al.. (2005). Loyaliteitsprogramma's: Klant is best te binden. University of Groningen research database (University of Groningen / Centre for Information Technology). 39. 60–62.
Bijmolt, Tammo H.A. & P.S. Zwart. (1994). The Impact of Internal Factors on the Export Success of Dutch Small and Medium-Sized Firms. Journal of Small Business Management. 32(2). 69.140 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.