Sylvia d’Apollonia
- Education top 0.5%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 2%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Information Systems top 5%
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology top 10%
- Co-authors
- Philip C. AbramiYiping LouPeter A. CohenBette ChambersCatherine PoulsenJohn C. SpenceElizabeth S. CharlesMichael Farrell
- Topics
- Evaluation of Teaching Practices (8 papers)Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers)Online and Blended Learning (5 papers)
- Partner nations
- CanadaUnited StatesChina
In The Last Decade
Sylvia d’Apollonia
22 papers receiving 1.6k citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 110
- Education 1.5k
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 649
- Social Psychology 291
- Information Systems 127
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 126
Countries citing papers authored by Sylvia d’Apollonia
This map shows the geographic impact of Sylvia d’Apollonia's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sylvia d’Apollonia with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sylvia d’Apollonia more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sylvia d’Apollonia
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sylvia d’Apollonia. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sylvia d’Apollonia. The network helps show where Sylvia d’Apollonia may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sylvia d’Apollonia
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sylvia d’Apollonia. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sylvia d’Apollonia based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sylvia d’Apollonia. Sylvia d’Apollonia is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | Learners not lurkers : connecting conceptual and social networks in science education / | 0 |
| 2 | Developing a conceptual framework to explain emergent causality: Overcoming ontological beliefs to achieve conceptual change | 8 |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 477 | |
| 5 | 19 | |
| 6 | 4 | |
| 7 | 2 | |
| 8 | 37 | |
| 9 | 355 | |
| 10 | 21 | |
| 11 | 498 | |
| 12 | 3 | |
| 13 | Positive social interdependence and classroom climate. | 12 |
| 14 | 10 | |
| 15 | 56 | |
| 16 | 7 | |
| 17 | 22 | |
| 18 | 222 | |
| 19 | 48 | |
| 20 | 81 |
About Sylvia d’Apollonia
Sylvia d’Apollonia is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and History and Philosophy of Science, having authored 23 papers that have together received 1.9k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (8 papers), Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (5 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Developmental and Educational Psychology (649 citations), Education (1.5k citations) and Computer Science Applications (125 citations). Sylvia d’Apollonia has collaborated with scholars based in Canada, United States and China. Frequent co-authors include Philip C. Abrami, Yiping Lou, Peter A. Cohen, Bette Chambers, Catherine Poulsen, John C. Spence, Elizabeth S. Charles, Peter A. Cohen, Michael Farrell and Chrystyna D. Kouros. Their work appears in journals such as American Psychologist, Journal of Educational Psychology and Review of Educational Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.