Stephen Sharp

467 total citations
35 papers, 306 citations indexed

About

Stephen Sharp is a scholar working on Education, Political Science and International Relations and Social Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Sharp has authored 35 papers receiving a total of 306 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Education, 4 papers in Political Science and International Relations and 3 papers in Social Psychology. Recurrent topics in Stephen Sharp's work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (4 papers). Stephen Sharp is often cited by papers focused on Evaluation of Teaching Practices (6 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (5 papers) and Higher Education Learning Practices (4 papers). Stephen Sharp collaborates with scholars based in United Kingdom, Malaysia and Nigeria. Stephen Sharp's co-authors include Gillian Sutherland, Pamela Munn, Janet Draper, Jonathan A C Sterne, Jane Κ. Brown, Gillean McCluskey, Gale Macleod, Simon Coleman, Gwynedd Lloyd and Lorna Hamilton and has published in prestigious journals such as Biometrika, Teaching and Teacher Education and Studies in Higher Education.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Sharp

30 papers receiving 244 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name	h						Papers	Cites
Stephen Sharp United Kingdom	11	190	46	27	26	26	35	306
Raul A. Leon United States	6	190 1.0×	41 0.9×	19 0.7×	64 2.5×	21 0.8×	10	292
Judith A. Ouimet United States	6	178 0.9×	75 1.6×	20 0.7×	37 1.4×	24 0.9×	10	312
Mitchell R. Williams United States	9	192 1.0×	34 0.7×	18 0.7×	29 1.1×	11 0.4×	42	277
Willis A. Jones United States	7	231 1.2×	69 1.5×	21 0.8×	66 2.5×	18 0.7×	28	347
Thomas Perry United Kingdom	12	207 1.1×	69 1.5×	43 1.6×	17 0.7×	18 0.7×	34	390
Alisa Percy Australia	11	303 1.6×	34 0.7×	31 1.1×	26 1.0×	32 1.2×	38	424
Leonard Goodwin United States	10	73 0.4×	90 2.0×	14 0.5×	33 1.3×	27 1.0×	35	332
Paula Baron Australia	7	124 0.7×	47 1.0×	12 0.4×	28 1.1×	22 0.8×	35	251
Qinghe Qu China	8	207 1.1×	46 1.0×	14 0.5×	18 0.7×	25 1.0×	9	304
Jason Snipes United States	9	272 1.4×	55 1.2×	17 0.6×	18 0.7×	14 0.5×	25	374

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Sharp

Since Specialization

Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Sharp's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Sharp with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Sharp more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Sharp

Since Specialization

Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Sharp. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Sharp. The network helps show where Stephen Sharp may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Sharp

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Sharp. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Sharp based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Sharp. Stephen Sharp is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

Sort: Min cites: Since: Top N: Style:

20 of 20 papers shown

Sharp, Stephen, et al.. (2019). 50+ Tech Tools for School Counselors: How to Be More Engaging, Efficient, and Effective. Corwin eBooks. 1 indexed citations

McCluskey, Gillean, Jane Κ. Brown, Pamela Munn, et al.. (2012). ‘Take more time to actually listen’: students' reflections on participation and negotiation in school. British Educational Research Journal. 39(2). 287–301. 28 indexed citations

Kilfedder, Catherine, Kevin Power, Thanos Karatzias, et al.. (2009). A randomized trial of face‐to‐face counselling versus telephone counselling versus bibliotherapy for occupational stress. Psychology and Psychotherapy Theory Research and Practice. 83(3). 223–242. 17 indexed citations

Sharp, Stephen. (2008). Tests for Independence in Two-Way Contingency Tables with Small Samples. Journal of Modern Applied Statistical Methods. 7(1). 180–186.

Sharp, Stephen & Simon Coleman. (2005). Ratings in the Research Assessment Exercise 2001 - the Patterns of University Status and Panel Membership. Higher Education Quarterly. 59(2). 153–171. 10 indexed citations

Sharp, Stephen. (2005). Book Review: Disseminating Qualitative Research in Educational Settings. Theory and Research in Education. 3(2). 254–255. 2 indexed citations

Sharp, Stephen. (2004). The research assessment exercises 1992–2001: patterns across time and subjects. Studies in Higher Education. 29(2). 201–218. 12 indexed citations

Sharp, Stephen, et al.. (2003). Early intervention in behaviour. Emotional and Behavioural Difficulties. 8(3). 173–188. 4 indexed citations

Sharp, Stephen & Linda Croxford. (2003). Literacy in the First Year of Schooling: A Multilevel Analysis. School Effectiveness and School Improvement. 14(2). 213–231. 5 indexed citations

10.

Sharp, Stephen & Janet Draper. (2000). Leaving the register: scottish teachers lost to the profession, 1997-98. Journal of In-service Education. 26(2). 247–266. 1 indexed citations

11.

Sharp, Stephen & Janet Draper. (2000). Leaving the register: Scottish teachers lost to the profession, 1997-98. Journal of In-service Education. 26(2). 247–266. 13 indexed citations

12.

Sharp, Stephen & Jonathan A C Sterne. (1999). Corrections to the meta-analysis command. Stata technical bulletin. 8(43). 11 indexed citations

13.

Sharp, Stephen & Jonathan A C Sterne. (1998). New syntax and output for the meta-analysis command. Stata technical bulletin. 7(42). 9 indexed citations

14.

Sharp, Stephen, Pamela Munn, & Lindsay Paterson. (1997). Quality Assessment in Higher Education: the Scottish Experience. Higher Education Quarterly. 51(4). 286–307. 2 indexed citations

15.

Sharp, Stephen, et al.. (1997). Disseminating development initiatives in British higher education: a case study. Higher Education. 33(3). 309–329. 6 indexed citations

16.

Sharp, Stephen. (1997). ‘Much more at home with 3.999 pupils than with four’ ¹ : The contributions to psychometrics of Sir Godfrey Thomson. British Journal of Mathematical and Statistical Psychology. 50(2). 163–174. 5 indexed citations

17.

Sharp, Stephen, Susan E. Thompson, & Doug Altman. (1996). Relation between treatment benefit and underlying risk in meta-analysis - Standard of ''label invariance'' should not abandoned - Author's reply. 313. 1550–1551. 1 indexed citations

18.

Sharp, Stephen. (1994). A statistical study of selective candidate withdrawal in a British general election. Electoral Studies. 13(2). 122–131. 1 indexed citations

19.

Sharp, Stephen & Alan Bray. (1980). W. H. Winch: A founder of the experimental approach in Education. British Journal of Educational Studies. 28(1). 34–45. 2 indexed citations

20.

Sharp, Stephen. (1978). Constructive properties of theoretical models. British Journal of Psychology. 69(1). 37–43.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact