Stephen Powers

649 total citations
75 papers, 463 citations indexed

About

Stephen Powers is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Stephen Powers has authored 75 papers receiving a total of 463 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 23 papers in Education, 20 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 17 papers in Experimental and Cognitive Psychology. Recurrent topics in Stephen Powers's work include Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (15 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (10 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers). Stephen Powers is often cited by papers focused on Education, Achievement, and Giftedness (15 papers), Educational and Psychological Assessments (10 papers) and Cognitive and developmental aspects of mathematical skills (8 papers). Stephen Powers collaborates with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Canada. Stephen Powers's co-authors include Michael J. Wagner, Ernst D. Thoutenhoofd, Sue Gregory, Douglas Thompson, Siegfried Streufert, Renee L. Marshall, Paul J. Gorman, Usha Satish, Thomas Krümmel and Stephen Rayner and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Life Sciences and Environmental Research Letters.

In The Last Decade

Stephen Powers

68 papers receiving 368 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stephen Powers United States 12 149 124 121 83 69 75 463
August Flammer Switzerland 10 127 0.9× 132 1.1× 129 1.1× 93 1.1× 38 0.6× 34 474
William G. Masten United States 13 234 1.6× 112 0.9× 97 0.8× 127 1.5× 57 0.8× 35 561
Shirley M. Yates Australia 10 260 1.7× 73 0.6× 113 0.9× 86 1.0× 25 0.4× 28 450
Robert Renaud Canada 13 388 2.6× 94 0.8× 122 1.0× 62 0.7× 58 0.8× 26 629
Patricia A. Connor‐Greene United States 12 225 1.5× 96 0.8× 68 0.6× 48 0.6× 25 0.4× 20 479
David Wallace United States 12 122 0.8× 42 0.3× 118 1.0× 33 0.4× 59 0.9× 35 509
Jan‐Erik Ruth Finland 8 45 0.3× 91 0.7× 71 0.6× 81 1.0× 43 0.6× 18 445
James O. Rust United States 14 176 1.2× 100 0.8× 78 0.6× 55 0.7× 26 0.4× 39 462
Jennifer Henderlong United States 4 180 1.2× 118 1.0× 202 1.7× 118 1.4× 12 0.2× 5 475
Liz Connors United Kingdom 9 174 1.2× 172 1.4× 158 1.3× 128 1.5× 25 0.4× 10 501

Countries citing papers authored by Stephen Powers

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stephen Powers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephen Powers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephen Powers more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stephen Powers

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephen Powers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephen Powers. The network helps show where Stephen Powers may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephen Powers

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephen Powers. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephen Powers based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephen Powers. Stephen Powers is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Watson, Linda, Stephen Powers, & Susan A. Gregory. (2013). Deaf and Hearing Impaired Pupils in Mainstream Schools. David Fulton Publishers eBooks. 5 indexed citations
2.
Rayner, Stephen, Helen Gunter, & Stephen Powers. (2002). Professional Development Needs for Leaders in Special Education. Journal of In-service Education. 28(1). 79–94. 2 indexed citations
3.
Satish, Usha, Siegfried Streufert, Renee L. Marshall, et al.. (2001). Strategic management simulations is a novel way to measure resident competencies. The American Journal of Surgery. 181(6). 557–561. 35 indexed citations
4.
Powers, Stephen. (1999). The Educational Attainments of Deaf Students in Mainstream Programs in England: Examination Results and Influencing Factors. American annals of the deaf. 144(3). 261–269. 18 indexed citations
5.
Powers, Stephen, et al.. (1997). Attitudes toward Police: An Evaluation of Community Perceptions of Safety. Perceptual and Motor Skills. 84(1). 114–114. 4 indexed citations
6.
Powers, Stephen & Christine E. Miller. (1987). Effects of a Drug Education Program on Third and Fourth Grade Pupils.. Journal of alcohol and drug education. 33(1). 25–30. 2 indexed citations
7.
Powers, Stephen. (1987). Attributions for Success and Failure of Japanese-American and Anglo-American University Students.. 24(3). 17–23. 4 indexed citations
8.
Powers, Stephen, et al.. (1986). Concurrent Validity of the standard progressive matrices for Hispanic and nonHispanic and seventh-grade students. Psychology in the Schools. 23(4). 333–336. 14 indexed citations
9.
Powers, Stephen, et al.. (1986). Comparison of Item Responses of English- and Spanish-Speaking Children Using Minimum Logit Chi-Squared Regression. Psychological Reports. 59(1). 235–239.
10.
Powers, Stephen, et al.. (1986). Validity of the Standard Progressive Matrices as a Predictor of Achievement of Sixth and Seventh Grade Students. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 46(3). 719–722. 2 indexed citations
11.
Powers, Stephen, et al.. (1986). A Computer Program to Perform a Multivariate Profile Analysis. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 46(1). 167–168.
12.
Powers, Stephen, et al.. (1985). Student Satisfaction with Graduate Education: Dimensionality and Assessment in a College Education.. 22(2). 46–49. 29 indexed citations
13.
Powers, Stephen. (1985). Attributions for Success and Failure in Algebra of Samoan Community College Students: A Profile Analysis.. Journal of instructional psychology. 6 indexed citations
14.
Powers, Stephen, et al.. (1985). Gender Differences in Selection of an Institution of Higher Education: A Discriminant Analysis. Psychological Reports. 56(1). 295–298. 1 indexed citations
15.
Powers, Stephen, et al.. (1985). Convergent Validity of the Multidimensional-Multiattributional Causality Scale with the Mathematics Attribution Scale. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 45(3). 689–692. 4 indexed citations
16.
Powers, Stephen. (1985). RMAX: A Microcomputer Program that Performs a Rasch Calibration of Test Items. Educational and Psychological Measurement. 45(1). 187–188. 2 indexed citations
17.
Powers, Stephen, et al.. (1983). Effect of Increasing Allocated and Engaged Instructional Time on the Achievement of High Risk Kindergarten Students: An Evaluation of the Chapter I Extended Time Kindergarten Project, 1982-83 and Technical Supplement.. 4 indexed citations
18.
Powers, Stephen, et al.. (1982). Relationship between Achievement Locus of Control and Expectancy of Success of Academically Gifted High School Students. Psychological Reports. 51(3_suppl). 1259–1262. 6 indexed citations
19.
Powers, Stephen, et al.. (1982). Correlates of Self-Esteem of Mexican American Adolescents. Psychological Reports. 51(3). 771–774. 8 indexed citations
20.
Powers, Stephen, et al.. (1981). Perceptions of Adult Basic Education Administrators and Teachers regarding Skills of Teaching.. 5(1). 33–41. 1 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026