Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
Thermodynamic Study of Advanced Supercritical Carbon Dioxide Power Cycles for Concentrating Solar Power Systems
2013421 citationsTy Neises, Michael J. Wagner et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Michael J. Wagner
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Michael J. Wagner's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Michael J. Wagner with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Michael J. Wagner more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Michael J. Wagner
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Michael J. Wagner. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Michael J. Wagner. The network helps show where Michael J. Wagner may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Michael J. Wagner
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Michael J. Wagner.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Michael J. Wagner based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Michael J. Wagner. Michael J. Wagner is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Williams, C., et al.. (2015). Rainfall-Runoff Dynamics Following Wildfire in Mountainous Headwater Catchments, Alberta, Canada.. AGU Fall Meeting Abstracts. 2015.2 indexed citations
12.
Williams, C., U. Silins, Michael J. Wagner, et al.. (2014). Impacts of Wildfire on Interception Losses and Net Precipitation in a Sub-Alpine Rocky Mountain Watershed in Alberta, Canada.. 2014 AGU Fall Meeting. 2014.1 indexed citations
13.
Williams, C., U. Silins, & Michael J. Wagner. (2012). Throughfall, Stemflow, and Rainfall Interception in a Severely Burned Subalpine Forest. AGUFM. 2012.1 indexed citations
14.
Wagner, Michael J.. (1998). INTERNET-BASED GIS AIDS AGENCY. 113(11). 40–40.1 indexed citations
15.
Weil, Roman L., et al.. (1995). Litigation services handbook : the role of the accountant as expert. Wiley eBooks.
16.
Wagner, Michael J.. (1993). What Juries Look for in CPAs. Journal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy. 176(5). 108.1 indexed citations
17.
Wagner, Michael J., et al.. (1992). Opportunities in Litigation Services. Journal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy. 173(6). 70.1 indexed citations
18.
Wagner, Michael J.. (1990). How Do You Measure Damages? Lost Income or Lost Cash Flow? the Choice of Method Can Make a Big Difference in the Final Amount. Journal of accountancy online/Journal of accountancy. 169(2). 28.
19.
Wagner, Michael J., et al.. (1990). Litigation services handbook : the role of the accountant as expert witness. Wiley eBooks.3 indexed citations
20.
Wagner, Michael J.. (1988). Technology: A Musical Explosion.. Music Educators Journal. 75(2). 30–33.1 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.