David Wallace

861 citations
35 papers · 509 indexed · h-index 12

Impact in

Papers in

David Wallace

32 papers receiving 426 citations

Peers

David Wallace
Comparison fields: 5 of 82
  • Gender Studies 133
  • Literature and Literary Theory 90
  • Clinical Psychology 152
  • Health 49
  • Social Psychology 118
Replace Ruth E. Ray with:
Ruth E. Ray United States
Maria Benedicta Monteiro Portugal
Carmen Oemig United States
M. L. Clark United States
Richard Kazelskis United States
Allan Wade Canada
Katherine A. Collins Canada
Brian R. Patterson United States
Judy Hall United States
Thomas L. Coffman United States
David Wallace relative to Ruth E. Ray United States Ruth E. Ray's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×
Ruth E. Ray · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by David Wallace

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of David Wallace's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by David Wallace with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites David Wallace more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by David Wallace

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by David Wallace. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by David Wallace. The network helps show where David Wallace may publish in the future.

Co-authors

The 22 scholars most cited alongside David Wallace, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with David Wallace Line = papers co-authored together David Wallace links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#Work
1 20241
2 201722
3 20141
4
Addiction postulates and legal causation, or who's in charge, person or brain?
20131
5
Youth Work in Communities and Schools
20119
6 201110
7 200915
8 20095
9 20088
10 20071
11 20061
12 20022
13
Mutuality in the Rhetoric and Composition Classroom
200013
14 199918
15
Reconsidering Behaviorist Composition Pedagogies: Positivism, Empiricism, and the Paradox of Postmodernism
19964
16 19961
17 19962
18 19947
19 19947
20 199124

About David Wallace

David Wallace is a scholar working on Literature and Literary Theory, Classics, Human Factors and Ergonomics, Social Psychology and Music, having authored 35 papers that have together received 509 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Discourse Analysis in Language Studies (6 papers), Counseling Practices and Supervision (5 papers), Higher Education Research Studies (3 papers), Themes in Literature Analysis (3 papers), Writing and Handwriting Education (3 papers), Medieval Literature and History (2 papers), Mental Health Treatment and Access (2 papers) and Mentoring and Academic Development (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Gender Studies (133 citations), Literature and Literary Theory (90 citations), Clinical Psychology (152 citations), Health (49 citations) and Social Psychology (118 citations). David Wallace has collaborated with scholars based in United States, United Kingdom and Italy. Frequent co-authors include Glenn E. Good, Tison Pugh, LeAdelle Phelps, Deborah A. Miller, Alex Waigandt, Jonathan Alexánder, Christina Haas, Charles A. Hill, Ben Z. Locke and John R. Hayes. Their work appears in journals such as College English, College Composition and Communication, Children's Literature Association quarterly, Journal of Traumatic Stress and Exemplaria.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026