Stephanie Pitts
- Music top 0.05%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Social Psychology top 5%
- Education top 5%
- Sociology and Political Science top 10%
- Co-authors
- Karen BurlandJane W. DavidsonChristopher P. SpencerNicola DibbenEric ClarkeJonathan GrossLiora BreslerKate Gee
- Topics
- Diverse Music Education Insights (47 papers)Neuroscience and Music Perception (28 papers)Music Therapy and Health (10 papers)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesSpain
In The Last Decade
Stephanie Pitts
60 papers receiving 828 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 73
- Music 706
- Cognitive Neuroscience 501
- Social Psychology 269
- Education 218
- Sociology and Political Science 161
Countries citing papers authored by Stephanie Pitts
This map shows the geographic impact of Stephanie Pitts's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stephanie Pitts with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stephanie Pitts more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Stephanie Pitts
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stephanie Pitts. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stephanie Pitts. The network helps show where Stephanie Pitts may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stephanie Pitts
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stephanie Pitts. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stephanie Pitts based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stephanie Pitts. Stephanie Pitts is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 0 | |
| 2 | 6 | |
| 3 | 6 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | Music, Language and Learning: Investigating the Impact of a Music Workshop Project in Four English Early Years Settings. | 9 |
| 6 | 19 | |
| 7 | 1 | |
| 8 | 10 | |
| 9 | 6 | |
| 10 | 20 | |
| 11 | 25 | |
| 12 | 42 | |
| 13 | Extra-curricular Music in UK Schools: Investigating the Aims, Experiences and Impact of Adolescent Musical Participation | 7 |
| 14 | 1 | |
| 15 | 35 | |
| 16 | Twenty-nine World Premiers in Two Hours: The Story of Powerplus | 3 |
| 17 | 10 | |
| 18 | 12 | |
| 19 | 1 | |
| 20 | Models of success and failure in instrumental learning: case studies of young players in the first 20 months of learning | 43 |
About Stephanie Pitts
Stephanie Pitts is a scholar working on Music, Cognitive Neuroscience and Urban Studies, having authored 66 papers that have together received 968 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Diverse Music Education Insights (47 papers), Neuroscience and Music Perception (28 papers) and Music Therapy and Health (10 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Music (706 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (501 citations) and Visual Arts and Performing Arts (74 citations). Stephanie Pitts has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Spain. Frequent co-authors include Karen Burland, Jane W. Davidson, Christopher P. Spencer, Nicola Dibben, Eric Clarke, Jonathan Gross, Liora Bresler, Kate Gee, Adrián Eley and Raymond MacDonald. Their work appears in journals such as Psychology of Music, Active Learning in Higher Education and Musicae Scientiae.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.