Kate Gee
- Conservation top 2%
- Art Therapy and Mental Health 3
- Music top 5%
- Diverse Music Education Insights 3
-
- Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes 1
-
- Health disparities and outcomes 3
-
- Music Therapy and Health 3
-
- Occupational Health and Safety Research 1
-
- Neural dynamics and brain function 1
-
- Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders 1
- Co-authors
- Daniel Tai-yin TsoiPeter WoodruffFergal W. JonesNeta SpiroUrszula TymoszukAaron WilliamonRosie PerkinsKwang-Hyuk Lee
- Cited by
- ConservationMusicApplied Psychology
- Journals
- Frontiers in Psychology (1 paper)Schizophrenia Research (1 paper)BMC Public Health (1 paper)
- Partner nations
- United KingdomUnited StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Kate Gee
14 papers receiving 251 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Conservation 37
- Music 21
- Applied Psychology 28
- Experimental and Cognitive Psychology 62
- Psychiatry and Mental health 62
Countries citing papers authored by Kate Gee
This map shows the geographic impact of Kate Gee's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Kate Gee with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Kate Gee more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Kate Gee
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Kate Gee. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Kate Gee. The network helps show where Kate Gee may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network
The 24 scholars most cited alongside Kate Gee, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.
All Works
| # | Work | ||
|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2025 | 0 | |
| 2 | 2024 | 1 | |
| 3 | 2022 | 6 | |
| 4 | 2021 | 26 | |
| 5 | 2021 | 33 | |
| 6 | 2021 | 13 | |
| 7 | Arts engagement trends in the UK and their mental and social wellbeing implications: HEartS survey | 2021 | 1 |
| 8 | 2019 | 17 | |
| 9 | 2019 | 1 | |
| 10 | 2018 | 36 | |
| 11 | Views of an audience: understanding the orchestral concert experience from player and listener perspectives | 2013 | 11 |
| 12 | 2012 | 5 | |
| 13 | 2008 | 33 | |
| 14 | 2008 | 76 | |
| 15 | 1993 | 3 |
About Kate Gee
Kate Gee is a scholar working on Music, Conservation, Neuropsychology and Physiological Psychology, Health and Social Psychology, having authored 15 papers that have together received 262 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Art Therapy and Mental Health (3 papers), Health disparities and outcomes (3 papers), Diverse Music Education Insights (3 papers), Music Therapy and Health (3 papers), Occupational Health and Safety Research (1 paper), Anxiety, Depression, Psychometrics, Treatment, Cognitive Processes (1 paper), Neural dynamics and brain function (1 paper) and Obsessive-Compulsive Spectrum Disorders (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Conservation (37 citations), Music (21 citations), Applied Psychology (28 citations), Experimental and Cognitive Psychology (62 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (62 citations). Kate Gee has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Daniel Tai-yin Tsoi, Peter Woodruff, Fergal W. Jones, Neta Spiro, Urszula Tymoszuk, Aaron Williamon, Rosie Perkins, Kwang-Hyuk Lee, Graham Pluck and Kritina Holden. Their work appears in journals such as Frontiers in Psychology, Schizophrenia Research, BMC Public Health, Psychological Medicine and Psychiatry Research.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.