Stan van Ginkel

1.4k total citations · 3 hit papers
29 papers, 919 citations indexed

About

Stan van Ginkel is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Computer Science Applications. According to data from OpenAlex, Stan van Ginkel has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 919 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Education, 9 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 5 papers in Computer Science Applications. Recurrent topics in Stan van Ginkel's work include Reflective Practices in Education (9 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (8 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (7 papers). Stan van Ginkel is often cited by papers focused on Reflective Practices in Education (9 papers), Evaluation of Teaching Practices (8 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (7 papers). Stan van Ginkel collaborates with scholars based in Netherlands, United States and Iran. Stan van Ginkel's co-authors include Omid Noroozi, H.J.A. Biemans, Martin Mulder, J.T.M. Gulikers, Seyyed Kazem Banihashem, Leah P. Macfadyen, Javad Hatami, Nafiseh Taghizadeh Kerman, Erkan Er and Jirarat Sitthiworachart and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Computers & Education and Review of Educational Research.

In The Last Decade

Stan van Ginkel

25 papers receiving 866 citations

Hit Papers

Teachers’ online teaching expectations and experiences du... 2020 2026 2022 2024 2020 2022 2023 50 100 150 200

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Stan van Ginkel Netherlands 11 573 232 201 136 115 29 919
Hsueh‐Hua Chuang Taiwan 15 553 1.0× 141 0.6× 198 1.0× 88 0.6× 68 0.6× 59 842
Regina Kaplan‐Rakowski United States 15 361 0.6× 156 0.7× 221 1.1× 116 0.9× 270 2.3× 48 921
Yunjo An United States 16 502 0.9× 315 1.4× 185 0.9× 131 1.0× 70 0.6× 39 827
Saman Ebadi Iran 19 560 1.0× 488 2.1× 285 1.4× 117 0.9× 79 0.7× 91 1.3k
Young Hoan Cho South Korea 13 501 0.9× 307 1.3× 143 0.7× 249 1.8× 53 0.5× 50 945
Jun Chen Hsieh Taiwan 11 723 1.3× 187 0.8× 289 1.4× 98 0.7× 67 0.6× 19 1.2k
Yan Dong China 15 603 1.1× 169 0.7× 231 1.1× 119 0.9× 23 0.2× 42 1.0k
Ying Xie United States 10 362 0.6× 282 1.2× 151 0.8× 107 0.8× 118 1.0× 34 700
Hans Christian Arnseth Norway 15 375 0.7× 352 1.5× 152 0.8× 179 1.3× 99 0.9× 39 898

Countries citing papers authored by Stan van Ginkel

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Stan van Ginkel's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Stan van Ginkel with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Stan van Ginkel more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Stan van Ginkel

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Stan van Ginkel. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Stan van Ginkel. The network helps show where Stan van Ginkel may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Stan van Ginkel

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Stan van Ginkel. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Stan van Ginkel based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Stan van Ginkel. Stan van Ginkel is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Banihashem, Seyyed Kazem, et al.. (2025). Can AI feedback stand alone for fostering students’ presentation performance? A comparison of AI-only versus teacher-supported AI feedback. Interactive Learning Environments. 1–18. 1 indexed citations
2.
Noroozi, Omid, et al.. (2025). Supporting peer learning with artificial intelligence: A systematic literature review. Innovations in Education and Teaching International. 62(5). 1648–1664.
3.
Ginkel, Stan van, et al.. (2025). How collaborative problem solving promotes higher-order thinking skills: A systematic review of design features and processes. Thinking Skills and Creativity. 59. 102001–102001.
4.
Ginkel, Stan van, et al.. (2024). Information problem solving during a digital authentic task: A thematic analysis of students’ strategies. Computers in Human Behavior Reports. 15. 100470–100470. 1 indexed citations
5.
Ginkel, Stan van, et al.. (2024). Towards teaching strategies addressing online learning in blended learning courses for adult-learners. Computers & Education. 219. 105103–105103. 8 indexed citations
6.
Kerman, Nafiseh Taghizadeh, et al.. (2023). Online peer feedback in higher education: A synthesis of the literature. Education and Information Technologies. 29(1). 763–813. 42 indexed citations breakdown →
7.
Ginkel, Stan van, et al.. (2023). The Effects of a Constructively Aligned Virtual Reality Setting on Professionals' Knowledge, Motivation and Perceptions. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 6(4). 561–582. 6 indexed citations
9.
Smakman, Matthijs, et al.. (2022). Exploring requirements and opportunities for social robots in primary mathematics education. 2022 31st IEEE International Conference on Robot and Human Interactive Communication (RO-MAN). 316–322. 1 indexed citations
11.
Ginkel, Stan van, et al.. (2020). The impact of computer‐mediated immediate feedback on developing oral presentation skills: An exploratory study in virtual reality. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 36(3). 412–422. 31 indexed citations
12.
Ginkel, Stan van, et al.. (2020). The added benefit of an extra practice session in virtual reality on the development of presentation skills: A randomized control trial. Journal of Computer Assisted Learning. 37(1). 253–264. 29 indexed citations
13.
Parmigiani, Davide, et al.. (2020). EDITORIAL. INNOVATION IN TEACHER EDUCATION. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 1 indexed citations
14.
Noroozi, Omid, et al.. (2020). Teachers’ online teaching expectations and experiences during the Covid19-pandemic in the Netherlands. European Journal of Teacher Education. 43(4). 623–638. 235 indexed citations breakdown →
15.
Ginkel, Stan van, et al.. (2019). Fostering oral presentation skills by the timing of feedback: an exploratory study in virtual reality. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11(1). 25–31. 7 indexed citations
16.
Ginkel, Stan van, et al.. (2019). Fostering oral presentation competence through a virtual reality-based task for delivering feedback. Computers & Education. 134. 78–97. 101 indexed citations
17.
Noroozi, Omid, et al.. (2018). Students’ online argumentative peer feedback, essay writing, and content learning: does gender matter?. Interactive Learning Environments. 28(6). 698–712. 86 indexed citations
18.
Ginkel, Stan van, J.T.M. Gulikers, H.J.A. Biemans, & Martin Mulder. (2016). Fostering oral presentation performance: does the quality of feedback differ when provided by the teacher, peers or peers guided by tutor?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 42(6). 953–966. 38 indexed citations
19.
Ginkel, Stan van, et al.. (2012). Building a Vibrant Honors Community among Commuter Students. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 13(2). 197–218. 5 indexed citations
20.
Ginkel, Stan van, et al.. (2012). Honors in the Master's: A New Perspective?.. Socio-Environmental Systems Modeling. 13(2). 265–278. 4 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026