Sónia Fonseca
- Molecular Biology top 10%
- Food Science top 5%
- Physiology top 10%
- Animal Science and Zoology top 2%
- Biological Psychiatry top 2%
- Co-authors
- Simon R. CardingAimée ParkerJavier CarballoInmaculada FrancoMaría GómezRégis StentzAriadna Miquel-ClopésJosé M. Lorenzo
- Topics
- Meat and Animal Product Quality (9 papers)Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (7 papers)Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (5 papers)
- Journals
- SHILAP Revista de lepidopterologíaFrontiers in MicrobiologyMeat Science
- Partner nations
- SpainUnited KingdomSwitzerland
In The Last Decade
Sónia Fonseca
19 papers receiving 1.3k citations
Hit Papers
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 104
- Molecular Biology 898
- Food Science 254
- Physiology 243
- Animal Science and Zoology 238
- Biological Psychiatry 213
Countries citing papers authored by Sónia Fonseca
This map shows the geographic impact of Sónia Fonseca's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sónia Fonseca with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sónia Fonseca more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Sónia Fonseca
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sónia Fonseca. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sónia Fonseca. The network helps show where Sónia Fonseca may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sónia Fonseca
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sónia Fonseca. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sónia Fonseca based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sónia Fonseca. Sónia Fonseca is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 70 | |
| 2 | 42 | |
| 3 | 150 | |
| 4 | 1 | |
| 5 | 142 | |
| 6 | 21 | |
| 7 | 110 | |
| 8 | Gut microbes and metabolites as modulators of blood-brain barrier integrity and brain healthbreakdown → | 477 |
| 9 | 36 | |
| 10 | 6 | |
| 11 | 15 | |
| 12 | 16 | |
| 13 | 1 | |
| 14 | 61 | |
| 15 | 51 | |
| 16 | 47 | |
| 17 | 38 | |
| 18 | 9 | |
| 19 | 50 |
About Sónia Fonseca
Sónia Fonseca is a scholar working on Animal Science and Zoology, Microbiology and Biological Psychiatry, having authored 19 papers that have together received 1.3k indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Meat and Animal Product Quality (9 papers), Protein Hydrolysis and Bioactive Peptides (7 papers) and Polyamine Metabolism and Applications (5 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Biological Psychiatry (213 citations), Microbiology (187 citations) and Animal Science and Zoology (238 citations). Sónia Fonseca has collaborated with scholars based in Spain, United Kingdom and Switzerland. Frequent co-authors include Simon R. Carding, Aimée Parker, Javier Carballo, Inmaculada Franco, María Gómez, Régis Stentz, Ariadna Miquel-Clopés, José M. Lorenzo, Ana L. Carvalho and Kathryn Cross. Their work appears in journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Frontiers in Microbiology and Meat Science.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.