Countries where authors publish in Gender and Education
Since Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of research published in Gender and Education. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by papers published in Gender and Education with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Gender and Education more than expected).
Fields of papers published in Gender and Education
This network shows the impact of papers published in Gender and Education. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers published in Gender and Education.
About Gender and Education
The 1.6k papers published in Gender and Education in the last decades have received a total of 34.0k indexed citations . Papers published in Gender and Education usually cover Gender Studies (951 papers), Education (594 papers) and Sociology and Political Science (682 papers) specifically the topics of Gender Roles and Identity Studies (557 papers), Gender Diversity and Inequality (340 papers), Gender, Feminism, and Media (168 papers), Teacher Education and Leadership Studies (148 papers), Youth Education and Societal Dynamics (145 papers), Early Childhood Education and Development (106 papers), Critical Race Theory in Education (97 papers) and Global Education and Multiculturalism (91 papers). The most active scholars publishing in Gender and Education are Jacob Clark Blickenstaff, Diane Reay, Emma Renold, Carrie Paechter, Valerie Walkerdine, Sandra Acker, Becky Francis, Bronwyn Davies, Jessica Ringrose and Louise Morley.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.