Şeniz Çelimli
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 5%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Developmental and Educational Psychology top 10%
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Daniel S. MessingerAllison S. NahmiasPaul J. YoderAlice S. CarterWendy L. StoneSibel Kazak BerumentBilge YağmurluNicholas D. Myers
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers)Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (2 papers)Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Child Psychology and PsychiatryBehavior Research MethodsStructural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal
- Partner nations
- United StatesTürkiyeUnited Kingdom
In The Last Decade
Şeniz Çelimli
7 papers receiving 466 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 53
- Clinical Psychology 345
- Cognitive Neuroscience 283
- Psychiatry and Mental health 127
- Developmental and Educational Psychology 114
- Education 90
Countries citing papers authored by Şeniz Çelimli
This map shows the geographic impact of Şeniz Çelimli's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Şeniz Çelimli with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Şeniz Çelimli more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Şeniz Çelimli
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Şeniz Çelimli. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Şeniz Çelimli. The network helps show where Şeniz Çelimli may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Şeniz Çelimli
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Şeniz Çelimli. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Şeniz Çelimli based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Şeniz Çelimli. Şeniz Çelimli is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 6 | |
| 2 | 28 | |
| 3 | 32 | |
| 4 | 59 | |
| 5 | 271 | |
| 6 | 29 | |
| 7 | 70 |
About Şeniz Çelimli
Şeniz Çelimli is a scholar working on Applied Psychology, Clinical Psychology and Management Science and Operations Research, having authored 7 papers that have together received 495 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (3 papers), Psychometric Methodologies and Testing (2 papers) and Mental Health Research Topics (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (345 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (283 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (114 citations). Şeniz Çelimli has collaborated with scholars based in United States, Türkiye and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Daniel S. Messinger, Allison S. Nahmias, Paul J. Yoder, Alice S. Carter, Wendy L. Stone, Sibel Kazak Berument, Bilge Yağmurlu, Nicholas D. Myers, Nikos Ntoumanis and Kimberley J. Bartholomew. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry, Behavior Research Methods and Structural Equation Modeling A Multidisciplinary Journal.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.