Renae Beaumont

22 papers receiving 522 citations

Peers

Renae Beaumont
Comparison fields: 5 of 47
  • Cognitive Neuroscience 436
  • Clinical Psychology 329
  • Developmental and Educational Psychology 176
  • Education 165
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 105
Replace Şeniz Çelimli with:
Şeniz Çelimli United States
Natalie I. Berger United States
Nicole L. Matthews United States
Jacquiline den Houting Australia
Kimberly Crosland United States
Karri Gillespie‐Smith United Kingdom
Wenn Lawson Australia
Heather K. Jennett United States
Christin A. McDonald United States
Whitney Ence United States
Renae Beaumont relative to Şeniz Çelimli United States Şeniz Çelimli's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.1×
Şeniz Çelimli · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Renae Beaumont

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Renae Beaumont's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Renae Beaumont with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Renae Beaumont more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Renae Beaumont

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Renae Beaumont. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Renae Beaumont. The network helps show where Renae Beaumont may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Renae Beaumont

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Renae Beaumont. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Renae Beaumont based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Renae Beaumont. Renae Beaumont is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 0
2 6
3 7
4 6
5 45
6 1
7 3
8
Implementation, Evaluation and Maintenance of a Social-Emotional Skills Training Program for Children with an Autism Spectrum Disorder in a Specialist School Setting.
1
9 16
10 1
11 1
12 37
13
An anxiety intervention program for adults on the autism spectrum: a pilot study
1
14 4
15 46
16 30
17 1
18 241
19 34
20 53

About Renae Beaumont

Renae Beaumont is a scholar working on Cognitive Neuroscience, Clinical Psychology and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 23 papers that have together received 560 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (19 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (13 papers) and Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (9 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Cognitive Neuroscience (436 citations), Clinical Psychology (329 citations) and Developmental and Educational Psychology (176 citations). Renae Beaumont has collaborated with scholars based in Australia, United States and United Kingdom. Frequent co-authors include Kate Sofronoff, Peter Newcombe, Jonathan A. Weiss, Hugh Walker, Kylie M. Gray, Patricia Howlin, Jacqueline Roberts, Stewart Einfeld, Marie Antoinette Hodge and John Taffe. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the American Academy of Child & Adolescent Psychiatry, Journal of Child Psychology and Psychiatry and Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026