Daniel W. Hoover
- Clinical Psychology top 5%
- Cognitive Neuroscience top 10%
- Psychiatry and Mental health top 10%
- Social Psychology
- Education top 10%
- Co-authors
- Joan KaufmanRichard MilichMonica J. HarrisElizabeth M. CorbittMarian BradyStuart W. TwemlowJudy SmithDouglas K. Snyder
- Topics
- Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers)Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers)Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers)
- Journals
- Journal of Personality and Social PsychologyJournal of Autism and Developmental DisordersJournal of Experimental Social Psychology
- Partner nations
- United StatesAustralia
In The Last Decade
Daniel W. Hoover
13 papers receiving 418 citations
Peers
Comparison fields: 5 of 69
- Clinical Psychology 294
- Cognitive Neuroscience 144
- Psychiatry and Mental health 104
- Social Psychology 83
- Education 64
Countries citing papers authored by Daniel W. Hoover
This map shows the geographic impact of Daniel W. Hoover's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Daniel W. Hoover with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Daniel W. Hoover more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Daniel W. Hoover
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Daniel W. Hoover. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Daniel W. Hoover. The network helps show where Daniel W. Hoover may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Daniel W. Hoover
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Daniel W. Hoover. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Daniel W. Hoover based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Daniel W. Hoover. Daniel W. Hoover is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
| # | Work | Indexed citations |
|---|---|---|
| 1 | 4 | |
| 2 | 8 | |
| 3 | 18 | |
| 4 | 125 | |
| 5 | Yoga-based Psychotherapy Groups for Boys Exposed to Trauma in Urban Settings. | 15 |
| 6 | 62 | |
| 7 | 29 | |
| 8 | 36 | |
| 9 | 5 | |
| 10 | 99 | |
| 11 | 7 | |
| 12 | 12 | |
| 13 | 30 |
About Daniel W. Hoover
Daniel W. Hoover is a scholar working on Clinical Psychology, Pharmacy and Developmental and Educational Psychology, having authored 13 papers that have together received 450 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Child and Adolescent Psychosocial and Emotional Development (8 papers), Family and Disability Support Research (4 papers) and Autism Spectrum Disorder Research (3 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Clinical Psychology (294 citations), Cognitive Neuroscience (144 citations) and Psychiatry and Mental health (104 citations). Daniel W. Hoover has collaborated with scholars based in United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Joan Kaufman, Richard Milich, Monica J. Harris, Elizabeth M. Corbitt, Marian Brady, Stuart W. Twemlow, Judy Smith, Douglas K. Snyder, Thomas A. Widiger and Patrice Ryce. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, Journal of Autism and Developmental Disorders and Journal of Experimental Social Psychology.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.