Sarah Stein

1.9k total citations
58 papers, 1.4k citations indexed

About

Sarah Stein is a scholar working on Education, Developmental and Educational Psychology and Sociology and Political Science. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah Stein has authored 58 papers receiving a total of 1.4k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 35 papers in Education, 8 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology and 5 papers in Sociology and Political Science. Recurrent topics in Sarah Stein's work include Evaluation of Teaching Practices (14 papers), Online and Blended Learning (11 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers). Sarah Stein is often cited by papers focused on Evaluation of Teaching Practices (14 papers), Online and Blended Learning (11 papers) and Innovative Teaching and Learning Methods (7 papers). Sarah Stein collaborates with scholars based in New Zealand, Australia and United States. Sarah Stein's co-authors include Mitchell Parkes, Chris Reading, Debra Bath, Richard Swann, Calvin Smith, Ian Ginns, Campbell J. McRobbie, Geoff Isaacs, Trish Andrews and Kerry Shephard and has published in prestigious journals such as Physical Review Letters, SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología and Journal of Biomechanics.

In The Last Decade

Sarah Stein

54 papers receiving 1.2k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah Stein New Zealand 16 872 186 171 150 111 58 1.4k
Anat Cohen Israel 19 486 0.6× 181 1.0× 172 1.0× 359 2.4× 33 0.3× 71 1.3k
Ioannis A. Tsoukalas Greece 16 248 0.3× 125 0.7× 152 0.9× 82 0.5× 30 0.3× 69 891
Rachel Charlotte Smith Denmark 25 376 0.4× 250 1.3× 181 1.1× 519 3.5× 15 0.1× 91 2.1k
Susan Lord United States 25 1.4k 1.6× 115 0.6× 180 1.1× 169 1.1× 10 0.1× 250 2.8k
Michael Russell United States 29 1.7k 2.0× 473 2.5× 538 3.1× 200 1.3× 4 0.0× 90 2.8k
David Hawkridge United Kingdom 14 368 0.4× 106 0.6× 136 0.8× 86 0.6× 4 0.0× 86 625
Tom Cooper Australia 14 630 0.7× 40 0.2× 168 1.0× 40 0.3× 10 0.1× 56 829
Liz McDowell United Kingdom 16 1.2k 1.3× 96 0.5× 201 1.2× 82 0.5× 43 1.6k
Robert A. Ellis Australia 20 1.1k 1.2× 158 0.8× 339 2.0× 245 1.6× 32 1.4k
Ove Edvard Hatlevik Norway 20 1.4k 1.6× 1.5k 8.0× 132 0.8× 321 2.1× 3 0.0× 50 2.5k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah Stein

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah Stein's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah Stein with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah Stein more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah Stein

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah Stein. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah Stein. The network helps show where Sarah Stein may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah Stein

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah Stein. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah Stein based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah Stein. Sarah Stein is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Smith, Hadley Stevens, Sarah Stein, Shawneequa Callier, et al.. (2025). P619: Risk factors for malignant hyperthermia crises and subsequent complications to inform model development for population newborn screening. Genetics in Medicine Open. 3. 102467–102467.
2.
Stein, Sarah, et al.. (2023). Person, context and judgement: Exploring the potential of a theoretical model describing the role of information and communication technology in the doctoral research process. Australasian Journal of Educational Technology. 39(4). 16–32. 1 indexed citations
3.
Acharya, Arpan, Philip D. Myers, Kabita Pandey, et al.. (2023). Efficient trapping and destruction of SARS-CoV-2 using PECO-assisted Molekule air purifiers in the laboratory and real-world settings. Ecotoxicology and Environmental Safety. 264. 115487–115487. 2 indexed citations
4.
Stein, Sarah, et al.. (2022). Investigating New Zealand radiation therapy student perceptions about their degree curriculum. BMC Medical Education. 22(1). 892–892.
5.
Stein, Sarah, et al.. (2020). Enhancing the roles of information and communication technologies in doctoral research processes. International Journal of Educational Technology in Higher Education. 17(1). 14 indexed citations
6.
Tweed, Mike, et al.. (2017). Certainty and safe consequence responses provide additional information from multiple choice question assessments. BMC Medical Education. 17(1). 106–106. 8 indexed citations
7.
Gray, Brendan, Sarah Stein, Phil Osborne, & Robert Aitken. (2013). Collaborative learning in a strategy education context. 8(1). 35–55. 4 indexed citations
8.
Stein, Sarah, et al.. (2013). From “Mentor” to “Role Model”: Scaling the involvement of STEM professionals through Role Model Videos. Journal of educational multimedia and hypermedia. 22(2). 209–223. 8 indexed citations
9.
Jaye, Chrystal, et al.. (2013). What do medical students learn about general practice in their undergraduate education. Focus on Health Professional Education A Multi-Professional Journal. 14(3). 84. 4 indexed citations
10.
McDonald, Jenny, et al.. (2013). An empirically-based, tutorial dialogue system. ASCILITE Publications. 562–572. 3 indexed citations
11.
McDonald, Jenny, et al.. (2013). An empirically-based, tutorial dialogue system: design, implementation and evaluation in a first year health sciences course.. 562–572. 1 indexed citations
12.
Stein, Sarah, et al.. (2013). Tertiary teachers and student evaluations: never the twain shall meet?. Assessment & Evaluation in Higher Education. 38(7). 892–904. 26 indexed citations
13.
Shephard, Kerry, et al.. (2011). Professional Development for E-Learning: Researching a Strategy for New Zealand's Tertiary Education Sector.. International journal on e-learning. 10(4). 461–481. 1 indexed citations
14.
Stein, Sarah & Rebecca Walker. (2010). Tertiary Teachers Learning About Teaching: Integrating Theoretical and Practical Knowledge. 5(1). 2–22. 2 indexed citations
15.
Stein, Sarah, Ian Ginns, & Christine V. McDonald. (2006). Teachers learning about technology and technology education: Insights from a professional development experience. International Journal of Technology and Design Education. 17(2). 179–195. 23 indexed citations
16.
Stein, Sarah, Ian Ginns, & Campbell J. McRobbie. (2003). Grappling with teaching design and technology: a beginning teacher's experiences. Research in Science & Technological Education. 21(2). 141–157. 5 indexed citations
17.
18.
Stein, Sarah, Campbell J. McRobbie, & Ian Ginns. (2002). Implications of missed opportunities for learning and assessment in design and technology education. Teaching and Teacher Education. 18(1). 35–49. 22 indexed citations
19.
McRobbie, Campbell J., Sarah Stein, & Ian Ginns. (2001). Exploring Designerly Thinking of Pre-service Teacher Education Students as Novice Designers. Research in Science Education. 52(15). 10760–10763. 1 indexed citations
20.
Ginns, Ian, Campbell J. McRobbie, & Sarah Stein. (2000). Implementing technology syllabus documents: How research can improve practice. Journal of Biomechanics. 38(8). 75–85.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Anat Cohen Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ioannis A. Tsoukalas Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Rachel Charlotte Smith Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Susan Lord Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Michael Russell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by David Hawkridge Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Tom Cooper Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Liz McDowell Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Robert A. Ellis Breakdown of academic impact, for papers by Ove Edvard Hatlevik
Rankless by CCL
2026