Sarah McGrew

2.7k total citations · 4 hit papers
29 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Sarah McGrew is a scholar working on Sociology and Political Science, Education and Developmental and Educational Psychology. According to data from OpenAlex, Sarah McGrew has authored 29 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 20 papers in Sociology and Political Science, 20 papers in Education and 15 papers in Developmental and Educational Psychology. Recurrent topics in Sarah McGrew's work include Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (15 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (12 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (11 papers). Sarah McGrew is often cited by papers focused on Educational Strategies and Epistemologies (15 papers), Educator Training and Historical Pedagogy (12 papers) and Online and Blended Learning (11 papers). Sarah McGrew collaborates with scholars based in United States. Sarah McGrew's co-authors include Sam Wineburg, Joel Breakstone, Teresa Ortega, Mark D. Smith, Virginia L. Byrne, Abby Reisman, Chauncey Monte‐Sano, Sarah Schneider Kavanagh, Elizabeth H. Simmons and Joseph Kahne and has published in prestigious journals such as Journal of Educational Psychology, Computers & Education and Teaching and Teacher Education.

In The Last Decade

Sarah McGrew

28 papers receiving 1.5k citations

Hit Papers

Can Students Evaluate Online Sources? Learning From Asses... 2016 2026 2019 2022 2018 2016 2019 2022 100 200 300

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Sarah McGrew United States 16 1.0k 749 445 436 228 29 1.6k
Monica Bulger United States 16 363 0.3× 572 0.8× 161 0.4× 213 0.5× 231 1.0× 30 1.1k
Julie Coiro United States 20 399 0.4× 1.2k 1.6× 899 2.0× 160 0.4× 526 2.3× 52 2.0k
Donald J. Leu United States 24 359 0.3× 1.2k 1.7× 838 1.9× 153 0.4× 388 1.7× 59 2.0k
Reima Al-Jarf Saudi Arabia 20 228 0.2× 615 0.8× 192 0.4× 80 0.2× 263 1.2× 206 1.6k
David Reinking United States 24 286 0.3× 1.3k 1.7× 812 1.8× 111 0.3× 375 1.6× 79 2.0k
Daniel G. Krutka United States 21 803 0.8× 1.1k 1.4× 344 0.8× 358 0.8× 336 1.5× 61 1.7k
Sarit Barzilai Israel 21 531 0.5× 1.3k 1.7× 1.5k 3.4× 113 0.3× 150 0.7× 39 2.1k
Guy Merchant United Kingdom 25 564 0.5× 868 1.2× 176 0.4× 236 0.5× 337 1.5× 60 1.6k
Greg Heiberger United States 5 856 0.8× 805 1.1× 219 0.5× 343 0.8× 310 1.4× 7 1.4k
Tian Luo United States 15 312 0.3× 636 0.8× 263 0.6× 138 0.3× 239 1.0× 81 1.1k

Countries citing papers authored by Sarah McGrew

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sarah McGrew's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sarah McGrew with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sarah McGrew more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sarah McGrew

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sarah McGrew. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sarah McGrew. The network helps show where Sarah McGrew may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Sarah McGrew

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Sarah McGrew. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Sarah McGrew based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Sarah McGrew. Sarah McGrew is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
McGrew, Sarah, et al.. (2025). “From personal experience, it’s true!”: Students’ digital evaluations on relevant issues. Journal of the Learning Sciences. 34(5). 743–786.
2.
McGrew, Sarah, et al.. (2024). Tackling misinformation through online information literacy: Structural and contextual considerations. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 56(1). 1–6. 4 indexed citations
3.
Breakstone, Joel, Sarah McGrew, & Mark D. Smith. (2024). Measuring what matters: Investigating what new types of assessments reveal about students’ online source evaluations. 3 indexed citations
4.
McGrew, Sarah. (2024). Talking about credibility, students, and facilitation: Opportunities to learn about teaching online evaluations in rehearsal debriefs. Teaching and Teacher Education. 153. 104813–104813. 1 indexed citations
5.
McGrew, Sarah, et al.. (2024). The Problem With Perspective: Students’ and Teachers’ Reasoning About Credibility During Discussions of Online Sources. Cognition and Instruction. 42(3). 399–425. 6 indexed citations
6.
McGrew, Sarah. (2023). Teaching lateral reading: Interventions to help people read like fact checkers. Current Opinion in Psychology. 55. 101737–101737. 19 indexed citations
7.
McGrew, Sarah, et al.. (2022). Fighting misinformation in college: students learn to search and evaluate online information through flexible modules. Information and Learning Sciences. 123(1/2). 45–64. 7 indexed citations
8.
Wineburg, Sam, Joel Breakstone, Sarah McGrew, Mark D. Smith, & Teresa Ortega. (2022). Lateral reading on the open Internet: A district-wide field study in high school government classes.. Journal of Educational Psychology. 114(5). 893–909. 89 indexed citations breakdown →
9.
Mirra, Nicole, Sarah McGrew, Joseph Kahne, Antero Garcia, & Brendesha M. Tynes. (2022). Expanding digital citizenship education to address tough issues. Phi Delta Kappan. 103(5). 31–35. 15 indexed citations
10.
McGrew, Sarah. (2021). Skipping the Source and Checking the Contents: An in-Depth Look at Students’ Approaches to Web Evaluation. Computers in the Schools. 38(2). 75–97. 13 indexed citations
11.
McGrew, Sarah & Virginia L. Byrne. (2020). Teaching Wikipedia: Supporting Students in Lifelong Learning.. ICLS. 4 indexed citations
12.
McGrew, Sarah & Virginia L. Byrne. (2020). Who Is behind this? Preparing high school students to evaluate online content. Journal of Research on Technology in Education. 53(4). 457–475. 41 indexed citations
13.
Reisman, Abby, et al.. (2019). Evidence of emergent practice: Teacher candidates facilitating historical discussions in their field placements. Teaching and Teacher Education. 80. 145–156. 37 indexed citations
14.
Kavanagh, Sarah Schneider, et al.. (2019). Teaching content in practice: Investigating rehearsals of social studies discussions. Teaching and Teacher Education. 86. 102863–102863. 27 indexed citations
15.
Wineburg, Sam & Sarah McGrew. (2019). Lateral Reading and the Nature of Expertise: Reading Less and Learning More When Evaluating Digital Information. Teachers College Record The Voice of Scholarship in Education. 121(11). 1–40. 188 indexed citations breakdown →
16.
McGrew, Sarah. (2019). Learning to evaluate: An intervention in civic online reasoning. Computers & Education. 145. 103711–103711. 103 indexed citations
17.
Breakstone, Joel, Sarah McGrew, Mark D. Smith, Teresa Ortega, & Sam Wineburg. (2018). Why we need a new approach to teaching digital literacy. Phi Delta Kappan. 99(6). 27–32. 76 indexed citations
18.
McGrew, Sarah, Joel Breakstone, Teresa Ortega, Mark D. Smith, & Sam Wineburg. (2018). Can Students Evaluate Online Sources? Learning From Assessments of Civic Online Reasoning. Theory & Research in Social Education. 46(2). 165–193. 313 indexed citations breakdown →
19.
McGrew, Sarah, Teresa Ortega, Joel Breakstone, & Sam Wineburg. (2017). The Challenge That's Bigger than Fake News: Civic Reasoning in a Social Media Environment.. The American Educator. 41(3). 4. 92 indexed citations
20.
Wineburg, Sam & Sarah McGrew. (2016). Evaluating information: The cornerstone of civic online reasoning. 271 indexed citations breakdown →

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026