Sara De Hauw

975 citations
7 papers · 612 indexed · h-index 5

Sara De Hauw

6 papers receiving 568 citations

Peers

Sara De Hauw
Comparison fields: 5 of 61
  • Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management 347
  • Life-span and Life-course Studies 16
  • Management of Technology and Innovation 97
  • Education 311
  • Human Factors and Ergonomics 24
Replace Linda M. Hite with:
Linda M. Hite United States
Sanghamitra Chaudhuri United States
Susan Eisner United States
Riitta Viitala Finland
Martin Mabunda Baluku Uganda
Ruth Helyer United Kingdom
Jennifer J. Dose United States
Svenja Tams United Kingdom
Melika Shirmohammadi United States
Tim Pitman Australia
Sara De Hauw relative to Linda M. Hite United States Linda M. Hite's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×3.2×
Linda M. Hite · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Sara De Hauw

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Sara De Hauw's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Sara De Hauw with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Sara De Hauw more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Sara De Hauw

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Sara De Hauw. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Sara De Hauw. The network helps show where Sara De Hauw may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network

The 6 scholars most cited alongside Sara De Hauw, linked wherever they have co-authored with each other. Click a name or a connecting line to browse the papers they share.

Border = papers with Sara De Hauw Line = papers co-authored together Sara De Hauw links everyone, so they are left out of the graph.

All Works

7 of 7 papers shown
#Work
1 20224
2
Can leadership style enhance or impoverish employee innovative work behaviour : the mediating role of psychological safety and team learning
20181
3 201536
4 201419
5 2011355
6 2010197
7
Best Practices in Competentieontwikkeling: een barometer voor bedrijven. Rapportering tweede bevraging van de eerste steekproef
20090

About Sara De Hauw

Sara De Hauw is a scholar working on Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management, Applied Psychology, Social Psychology, Management of Technology and Innovation and Education, having authored 7 papers that have together received 612 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Job Satisfaction and Organizational Behavior (3 papers), Workaholism, burnout, and well-being (2 papers), Higher Education and Employability (2 papers), Competency Development and Evaluation (1 paper), Entrepreneurship Studies and Influences (1 paper), Dutch Social and Cultural Studies (1 paper), Human Resource Development and Performance Evaluation (1 paper) and Work-Family Balance Challenges (1 paper). The work is most often cited by research in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management (347 citations), Life-span and Life-course Studies (16 citations), Management of Technology and Innovation (97 citations), Education (311 citations) and Human Factors and Ergonomics (24 citations). Sara De Hauw has collaborated with scholars based in Belgium, Netherlands and Germany. Frequent co-authors include Ans De Vos, B.I.J.M. van der Heijden, Jeffrey H. Greenhaus, J. Semeijn, Tinka van Vuuren and Irina Nikolova. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of Business and Psychology, Journal of Vocational Behavior, The International Journal of Human Resource Management, Australian Journal of Career Development and Academy of Management Proceedings.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026