Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
EFFECTS OF PROCEDURAL AND DISTRIBUTIVE JUSTICE ON REACTIONS TO PAY RAISE DECISIONS.
19891.8k citationsRobert Folger, Mary A. KonovskyAcademy of Management Journalprofile →
Retaliation in the workplace: The roles of distributive, procedural, and interactional justice.
19971.6k citationsDaniel P. Skarlicki, Robert FolgerJournal of Applied Psychologyprofile →
Organizational Justice and Human Resource Management
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert Folger's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert Folger with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert Folger more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert Folger. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert Folger. The network helps show where Robert Folger may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert Folger
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert Folger.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert Folger based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert Folger. Robert Folger is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Salvador, Rommel O., Robert Folger, & Manuela Priesemuth. (2012). ORGANIZATIONAL APOLOGY AND DEFENSE: EFFECTS OF GUILT AND MANAGERIAL STATUS. Journal of managerial issues. 24(2). 124.7 indexed citations
4.
Folger, Robert, et al.. (2010). Escribiendo la independencia. Perspectivas postcoloniales sobre la literatura hispanoamericana del siglo XIX. Iberoamericana Vervuert eBooks. 132.1 indexed citations
5.
Piccolo, Ronald F., Rebecca L. Greenbaum, Deanne N. Den Hartog, & Robert Folger. (2010). The relationship between ethical leadership and core job characteristics. Journal of Organizational Behavior. 31(2-3). 259–278.579 indexed citations breakdown →
Aquino, Karl, Steven L. Grover, Barry M. Goldman, & Robert Folger. (2003). When Push doesn't Come to Shove. Journal of Management Inquiry. 12(3). 209–216.107 indexed citations
Cobb, Anthony T., Robert Folger, & Kevin C. Wooten. (1995). The Role Justice Plays in Organizational Change. Public Administration Quarterly. 19(2). 135.40 indexed citations
11.
Folger, Robert, Blair H. Sheppard, & Robert T. Buttram. (1995). Equity, equality, and need: Three faces of social justice..27 indexed citations
Folger, Robert, et al.. (1985). Nonreactive measurement: A focus for research on absenteeism and occupational stress.. Research in Organizational Behavior.18 indexed citations
Andreoli, Virginia, Stephen Worchel, & Robert Folger. (1974). Implied threat to behavioral freedom.. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology. 30(6). 765–771.28 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.