Hit papers significantly outperform the citation benchmark for their cohort. A paper qualifies
if it has ≥500 total citations, achieves ≥1.5× the top-1% citation threshold for papers in the
same subfield and year (this is the minimum needed to enter the top 1%, not the average
within it), or reaches the top citation threshold in at least one of its specific research
topics.
The Sociomateriality of Information Systems: Current Status, Future Directions
2014255 citationsRobert D. Galliers, Sue Newell et al.profile →
Peers — A (Enhanced Table)
Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late)
cites ·
hero ref
Countries citing papers authored by Robert D. Galliers
Since
Specialization
Citations
This map shows the geographic impact of Robert D. Galliers's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Robert D. Galliers with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Robert D. Galliers more than expected).
Fields of papers citing papers by Robert D. Galliers
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Robert D. Galliers. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Robert D. Galliers. The network helps show where Robert D. Galliers may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Robert D. Galliers
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Robert D. Galliers.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Robert D. Galliers based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Robert D. Galliers. Robert D. Galliers is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
All Works
20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Wilson, Alex, et al.. (2017). Open strategy and IT: A review and research agenda. Loughborough University Institutional Repository (Loughborough University).4 indexed citations
2.
Marabelli, Marco, S. Newell, & Robert D. Galliers. (2016). The Materiality of Impression Management in Social Media Use: A focus on Time, Space and Algorithms. International Conference on Information Systems.2 indexed citations
3.
Deng, Xuefei, Yibai Li, & Robert D. Galliers. (2016). Business Analytics Education: A Latent Semantic Analysis of Skills, Knowledge and Abilities Required for Business versus Non-Business Graduates.. International Conference on Information Systems.2 indexed citations
4.
Marabelli, Marco, S. Newell, & Robert D. Galliers. (2015). The Role of Power and Materiality in Healthcare Improvement Initiatives: A Strategy-as-practice Perspective. International Conference on Information Systems.2 indexed citations
5.
Galliers, Robert D., et al.. (2013). Sources of Power and CIO Influence and Their Impact: An Explorative Survey. International Conference on Information Systems.1 indexed citations
Galliers, Robert D., et al.. (2011). AFFECT AND MATERIALITY IN ENTERPRISE SYSTEMS USAGE: SETTING THE STAGE FOR USER EXPERIENCE. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.2 indexed citations
8.
Galliers, Robert D. & Jimmy Huang. (2011). The Teaching of Qualitative Research Methods in Information Systems: An Explorative Study Utilising Learning Theory. SSRN Electronic Journal.1 indexed citations
9.
Desouza, Kevin C., et al.. (2007). Social Activism in Information Systems Research: Making the World a Better Place. Journal of the Association for Information Systems.1 indexed citations
Desouza, Kevin C., et al.. (2006). Social Activism in IS Research: Making the World a Better Place.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 49(76). 123–29.2 indexed citations
12.
Galliers, Robert D. & Edgar A. Whitley. (2002). AN ANATOMY OF EUROPEAN INFORMATION SYSTEMS RESEARCH ECIS 1993-ECIS 2002: SOME INITIAL FINDINGS. London School of Economics and Political Science Research Online (London School of Economics and Political Science). 3–18.27 indexed citations
13.
Finnegan, Patrick, Robert D. Galliers, & Philip Powell. (2002). PLANNING ELECTRONIC TRADING SYSTEMS: RE-THINKING IS PRACTICES VIA TRIPLE LOOP LEARNING. European Conference on Information Systems. 252–261.2 indexed citations
14.
Galliers, Robert D. & Sue Newell. (2001). Back to the Future: From Knowledge Management to Data Management. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 609–615.48 indexed citations
15.
Larsen, Tor J., Pat Finnegan, Robert D. Galliers, & Sirkka L. Järvenpää. (2000). Integrating eBusiness, Knowledge Management and Policy Considerations Within an Information Systems Strategy Framework. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 730–736.
16.
Galliers, Robert D. & Walter Baets. (1998). Information technology and organizational transformation: innovation for the 21st century organization. John Wiley & Sons, Inc. eBooks.42 indexed citations
17.
Levy, Margi, Philip Powell, Yasmin Merali, & Robert D. Galliers. (1997). Assessing Information Systems Strategy Development Frameworks in SMEs.. European Conference on Information Systems. 553–569.2 indexed citations
18.
Finnegan, Pat, Robert D. Galliers, & Philip Powell. (1996). Inter-Organisational Information Systems Planning: Testing Theory and Practice.. European Conference on Information Systems. 1125–1132.1 indexed citations
19.
Galliers, Robert D.. (1988). Information systems planning in the United Kingdom and Australia—a comparison of current practice. Oxford University Press eBooks. 223–255.63 indexed citations
20.
Galliers, Robert D.. (1986). Educating information systems managers into the 1990s: the WAIT example. Cambridge University Press eBooks. 166–178.
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.