Phillip Ein-Dor

2.3k total citations
48 papers, 1.6k citations indexed

About

Phillip Ein-Dor is a scholar working on Management Information Systems, Sociology and Political Science and Communication. According to data from OpenAlex, Phillip Ein-Dor has authored 48 papers receiving a total of 1.6k indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 13 papers in Management Information Systems, 10 papers in Sociology and Political Science and 7 papers in Communication. Recurrent topics in Phillip Ein-Dor's work include Information Systems Theories and Implementation (10 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (6 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (6 papers). Phillip Ein-Dor is often cited by papers focused on Information Systems Theories and Implementation (10 papers), Big Data and Business Intelligence (6 papers) and Knowledge Management and Sharing (6 papers). Phillip Ein-Dor collaborates with scholars based in Israel, United States and New Zealand. Phillip Ein-Dor's co-authors include Eli Segev, Michael Myers, K. S. Raman, William R. King, Saggi Nevo, Dorit Nevo, Paul Alpar, Brian Hollocks, Leonard Leibovici and Yoav Yehezkelli and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, Management Science and Communications of the ACM.

In The Last Decade

Phillip Ein-Dor

46 papers receiving 1.4k citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Phillip Ein-Dor Israel 18 748 471 385 361 227 48 1.6k
Steve Smithson United Kingdom 22 692 0.9× 350 0.7× 412 1.1× 292 0.8× 193 0.9× 59 1.4k
Guy Fitzgerald United Kingdom 22 722 1.0× 253 0.5× 321 0.8× 321 0.9× 291 1.3× 62 1.4k
Mo Adam Mahmood United States 16 554 0.7× 637 1.4× 259 0.7× 396 1.1× 168 0.7× 32 1.5k
John F. Rockart United States 19 1.2k 1.6× 467 1.0× 394 1.0× 694 1.9× 356 1.6× 44 2.4k
Peter Kawalek United Kingdom 19 706 0.9× 451 1.0× 314 0.8× 263 0.7× 315 1.4× 70 1.5k
Bruce R. Lewis United States 16 591 0.8× 309 0.7× 215 0.6× 406 1.1× 172 0.8× 24 1.4k
Andreas I. Nicolaou United States 17 859 1.1× 704 1.5× 447 1.2× 315 0.9× 149 0.7× 39 1.7k
Scott Hamilton United States 8 530 0.7× 312 0.7× 383 1.0× 167 0.5× 165 0.7× 25 1.1k
Ranjit Bose United States 18 527 0.7× 390 0.8× 255 0.7× 628 1.7× 205 0.9× 30 1.7k
Niv Ahituv Israel 19 569 0.8× 273 0.6× 197 0.5× 252 0.7× 284 1.3× 69 1.4k

Countries citing papers authored by Phillip Ein-Dor

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Phillip Ein-Dor's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Phillip Ein-Dor with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Phillip Ein-Dor more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Phillip Ein-Dor

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Phillip Ein-Dor. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Phillip Ein-Dor. The network helps show where Phillip Ein-Dor may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Phillip Ein-Dor

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Phillip Ein-Dor. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Phillip Ein-Dor based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Phillip Ein-Dor. Phillip Ein-Dor is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Nevo, Saggi, Dorit Nevo, & Phillip Ein-Dor. (2010). Classifying Information Technologies: A Multidimensional Scaling Approach. Communications of the Association for Information Systems. 27. 17 indexed citations
2.
Stanchev, Peter, et al.. (2010). Semantic and abstraction content of art images. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 42. 1 indexed citations
3.
Ahituv, Niv, et al.. (2010). EVALUATING AND RANKING LOCAL E- GOVERNMENT SERVICES. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 34(877). 68–272. 1 indexed citations
4.
Ein-Dor, Phillip. (2008). The Internet in Israel: 1999-2007 with International Comparisons. Journal of Global Information Technology Management. 11(3). 65–93. 1 indexed citations
5.
Desouza, Kevin C., et al.. (2007). Social Activism in Information Systems Research: Making the World a Better Place. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1 indexed citations
6.
Desouza, Kevin C., et al.. (2006). Social Activism in IS Research: Making the World a Better Place.. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 49(76). 123–29. 2 indexed citations
7.
Leshno, Moshe, et al.. (2003). Neural nets in a group decision process. International Journal of Game Theory. 31(3). 447–467. 11 indexed citations
8.
Avison, David, et al.. (2002). Scholarly Products in IS: Will Advances in Electronic Media Promote Evolutionary or Radical Change?. International Conference on Information Systems. 1 indexed citations
9.
Alter, Steven, M. Lynne Markus, Judy Scott, Phillip Ein-Dor, & Iris Vessey. (2000). Does the trend toward e-business call for changes in fundamental concepts of information systems? (Debate). International Conference on Information Systems. 707–709. 9 indexed citations
10.
Leibovici, Leonard, et al.. (1997). Improving empirical antibiotic treatment: prospective, nonintervention testing of a decision support system. Journal of Internal Medicine. 242(5). 395–400. 50 indexed citations
11.
Ein-Dor, Phillip. (1997). The Fourth International Workshop on Artificial Intelligence in Economics and Management. AI Magazine. 18(1). 131–132. 2 indexed citations
12.
Ein-Dor, Phillip, Michael Myers, & K. S. Raman. (1997). Information Technology in Three Small Developed Countries. Journal of Management Information Systems. 13(4). 61–89. 46 indexed citations
13.
Ein-Dor, Phillip. (1996). Artificial intelligence in economics and management : an edited proceedings on the Fourth International Workshop : AIEM4, Tel-Aviv, Israel, January 8-10, 1996. Kluwer Academic eBooks. 3 indexed citations
14.
Ein-Dor, Phillip & Israel Spiegler. (1995). Natural Language Access to Multiple Databases: A Model and a Prototype. Journal of Management Information Systems. 12(1). 171–197. 10 indexed citations
15.
Ein-Dor, Phillip & Eli Segev. (1993). A Classification of Information Systems: Analysis and Interpretation. Information Systems Research. 4(2). 166–204. 70 indexed citations
16.
Ein-Dor, Phillip & Eli Segev. (1991). Intensity of end user computing. ACM SIGMIS Database the DATABASE for Advances in Information Systems. 22(1-2). 30–37. 11 indexed citations
17.
Ein-Dor, Phillip. (1986). Attitudes, Association and success of MIS: Some empirical results from Research in the Context of a Business Game. The Computer Journal. 29(3). 212–221. 13 indexed citations
18.
Ein-Dor, Phillip. (1985). Grosch's law re-revisited: CPU power and the cost of computation. Communications of the ACM. 28(2). 142–151. 51 indexed citations
19.
Ein-Dor, Phillip & Eli Segev. (1982). Organizational Context and MIS Structure: Some Empirical Evidence*. MIS Quarterly. 6(3). 55–68. 255 indexed citations
20.
Ein-Dor, Phillip, et al.. (1981). Use of Management Information Systems: An Empirical Study. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 1. 25 indexed citations

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026