Philip Powell

20 papers receiving 462 citations

Peers

Philip Powell
Comparison fields: 5 of 103
  • Psychiatry and Mental health 177
  • General Health Professions 131
  • Management Information Systems 75
  • Public Health, Environmental and Occupational Health 64
  • Clinical Psychology 55
Replace Christian Mauro with:
Christian Mauro Germany
Louis M. Hsu United States
Dong Shen China
Robert Gould United States
Edward Hallowell United States
Janne Engblom Finland
Robert M. Pruzek United States
Cheryl Dye United States
Rita Snyder‐Halpern United States
Ingrid Munck Sweden
Philip Powell relative to Christian Mauro Germany Christian Mauro's profile →
Citations per field
00.5×2.9×
Christian Mauro · 1×
Citations per year

Countries citing papers authored by Philip Powell

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Philip Powell's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Philip Powell with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Philip Powell more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Philip Powell

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Philip Powell. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Philip Powell. The network helps show where Philip Powell may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Philip Powell

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Philip Powell. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Philip Powell based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Philip Powell. Philip Powell is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
#WorkIndexed citations
1 25
2 61
3 3
4
The transformational role of e-learning in higher education
3
5
ENTERprise Information Systems: International Conference, CENTERIS 2011, Vilamoura, Algarve, Portugal, October 5-7, 2011. Proceedings, Part III
2
6 12
7 1
8
E-learning enabled institutional transformation
2
9
2+2=3? E-Learning Strategies in HE
1
10 196
11 70
12
Inter-Organisational Information Systems Planning: Testing Theory and Practice.
1
13 11
14 2
15
Decision making and gender: the implications for DSS
1
16 78
17 12
18
Information Systems: A Management Perspective
13
19 8
20 7

About Philip Powell

Philip Powell is a scholar working on Geriatrics and Gerontology, Management Information Systems and Pharmacy, having authored 20 papers that have together received 509 indexed citations. Recurring topics across this work include Eating Disorders and Behaviors (2 papers), Obesity, Physical Activity, Diet (2 papers) and Information Technology Governance and Strategy (2 papers). The work is most often cited by research in Psychiatry and Mental health (177 citations), General Decision Sciences (16 citations) and Management Information Systems (75 citations). Philip Powell has collaborated with scholars based in United Kingdom, United States and Australia. Frequent co-authors include Robert D. Galliers, Margi Levy, Edmond P. Wickham, Suzanne E. Mazzeo, Melanie K. Bean, Karen Ingersoll, C. Martin, Ricardo Martinho, Marilyn Stern and Jo�ão Varaj�ão. Their work appears in journals such as Journal of the Operational Research Society, Information & Management and The Journal of Strategic Information Systems.

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026