This map shows the geographic impact of Margi Levy's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Margi Levy with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Margi Levy more than expected).
This network shows the impact of papers produced by Margi Levy. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Margi Levy. The network helps show where Margi Levy may publish in the future.
Co-authorship network of co-authors of Margi Levy
This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Margi Levy.
A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Margi Levy based on the total number of
citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges
represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together.
Node borders
signify the number of papers an author published with Margi Levy. Margi Levy is excluded from
the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.
Levy, Margi, Philip Powell, & Philip Yetton. (2009). Contingent dynamics of IS alignment in SMEs. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 392–403.6 indexed citations
Powell, Philip & Margi Levy. (2006). Lessons for managing IS in small firms. Information Resources Management Journal. 19(4).2 indexed citations
5.
Levy, Margi, et al.. (2005). Is strategy in SMEs using organizational capabilities:The cpx framework. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 321–332.2 indexed citations
6.
Levy, Margi, et al.. (2004). SMEs and Internet Adoption Strategy: Who Do SMEs Listen To?. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 177–188.24 indexed citations
Loebbecke, Claudia, Philip Powell, & Margi Levy. (2003). Smes, Co-Opetition and Knowledge Sharing: The Role of Information Systems. SSRN Electronic Journal.8 indexed citations
9.
Levy, Margi, Philip Powell, & Philip Yetton. (2003). IS alignment in small firms: new paths through the maze.. European Conference on Information Systems. 1051–1061.18 indexed citations
10.
Levy, Margi & Philip Powell. (2002). SME Internet Adoption: Towards a Transporter Model. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 38.11 indexed citations
11.
Levy, Margi & Philip Powell. (2002). SME Transformation: Modelling Progressions. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 676–685.5 indexed citations
12.
Levy, Margi, et al.. (2001). Information Systems Strategies in Knowledge-Based Smes: The Role of Core Competencies. SSRN Electronic Journal.
13.
Levy, Margi, Claudia Loebbecke, & Philip Powell. (2001). SMEs, CO-OPETITION AND KNOWLEDGE SHARING: THE IS ROLE. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 640–652.9 indexed citations
14.
Levy, Margi, Philip Powell, & Philip Yetton. (2001). SMEs: Aligning is and the Strategic Context. Journal of the Association for Information Systems. 16(3). 133–144.220 indexed citations
Loebbecke, Claudia, Philip Powell, Paul C. van Fenema, & Margi Levy. (1999). SMEs, Co-opetition and Knowledge Transfer.. European Conference on Information Systems. 791–798.4 indexed citations
Levy, Margi, Philip Powell, Yasmin Merali, & Robert D. Galliers. (1997). Assessing Information Systems Strategy Development Frameworks in SMEs.. European Conference on Information Systems. 553–569.2 indexed citations
Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive
bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global
research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include
incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and
delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in
Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.