Ricardo Mateo

675 total citations
39 papers, 448 citations indexed

About

Ricardo Mateo is a scholar working on Strategy and Management, Management Information Systems and Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. According to data from OpenAlex, Ricardo Mateo has authored 39 papers receiving a total of 448 indexed citations (citations by other indexed papers that have themselves been cited), including 17 papers in Strategy and Management, 17 papers in Management Information Systems and 8 papers in Organizational Behavior and Human Resource Management. Recurrent topics in Ricardo Mateo's work include Quality and Supply Management (16 papers), Quality and Management Systems (10 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (6 papers). Ricardo Mateo is often cited by papers focused on Quality and Supply Management (16 papers), Quality and Management Systems (10 papers) and Healthcare Quality and Management (6 papers). Ricardo Mateo collaborates with scholars based in Spain, Uruguay and Chile. Ricardo Mateo's co-authors include Elisabeth Viles, Carmen Jaca, Martín Tanco, Javier Santos, Daniel Jurburg, Brice Corgnet, Roberto Hernán González, Álvaro Lleó, Laura Ilzarbe and Alicia Núñez and has published in prestigious journals such as SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología, PLoS ONE and Journal of Advanced Nursing.

In The Last Decade

Ricardo Mateo

35 papers receiving 428 citations

Peers — A (Enhanced Table)

Peers by citation overlap · career bar shows stage (early→late) cites · hero ref

Name h Career Trend Papers Cites
Ricardo Mateo Spain 12 213 178 84 66 40 39 448
Roel Schouteten Netherlands 13 183 0.9× 177 1.0× 115 1.4× 36 0.5× 29 0.7× 37 487
Manoj Patwardhan India 10 99 0.5× 135 0.8× 123 1.5× 59 0.9× 28 0.7× 30 388
Matthew A. Schwieterman United States 12 168 0.8× 253 1.4× 52 0.6× 21 0.3× 54 1.4× 21 476
Julio Juan García Sabater Spain 11 232 1.1× 179 1.0× 44 0.5× 63 1.0× 81 2.0× 60 451
Ingela Bäckström Sweden 13 257 1.2× 187 1.1× 132 1.6× 66 1.0× 21 0.5× 63 476
Pernilla Ingelsson Sweden 11 177 0.8× 151 0.8× 82 1.0× 52 0.8× 12 0.3× 52 313
Charlene A. Yauch United States 8 237 1.1× 194 1.1× 56 0.7× 49 0.7× 16 0.4× 10 504
C. J. McNair United States 7 327 1.5× 165 0.9× 124 1.5× 84 1.3× 39 1.0× 17 646
Karen Moustafa Leonard United States 11 276 1.3× 254 1.4× 87 1.0× 67 1.0× 12 0.3× 28 556
David M. Lyth United States 10 134 0.6× 110 0.6× 191 2.3× 51 0.8× 18 0.5× 17 417

Countries citing papers authored by Ricardo Mateo

Since Specialization
Citations

This map shows the geographic impact of Ricardo Mateo's research. It shows the number of citations coming from papers published by authors working in each country. You can also color the map by specialization and compare the number of citations received by Ricardo Mateo with the expected number of citations based on a country's size and research output (numbers larger than one mean the country cites Ricardo Mateo more than expected).

Fields of papers citing papers by Ricardo Mateo

Since Specialization
Physical SciencesHealth SciencesLife SciencesSocial Sciences

This network shows the impact of papers produced by Ricardo Mateo. Nodes represent research fields, and links connect fields that are likely to share authors. Colored nodes show fields that tend to cite the papers produced by Ricardo Mateo. The network helps show where Ricardo Mateo may publish in the future.

Co-authorship network of co-authors of Ricardo Mateo

This figure shows the co-authorship network connecting the top 25 collaborators of Ricardo Mateo. A scholar is included among the top collaborators of Ricardo Mateo based on the total number of citations received by their joint publications. Widths of edges represent the number of papers authors have co-authored together. Node borders signify the number of papers an author published with Ricardo Mateo. Ricardo Mateo is excluded from the visualization to improve readability, since they are connected to all nodes in the network.

All Works

20 of 20 papers shown
1.
Mateo, Ricardo, et al.. (2023). Priorities and root cause analysis of quality and safety problems in chilean hospitals. Revista médica de Chile. 151(2). 139–150.
3.
Núñez‐Córdoba, Jorge M., et al.. (2021). Root causes of adverse drug events in hospitals and artificial intelligence capabilities for prevention. Journal of Advanced Nursing. 77(7). 3168–3175. 2 indexed citations
4.
Mateo, Ricardo, et al.. (2021). Metodologías de aprendizaje para ejecutivos. Análisis comparativo del aprendizaje social y del método del caso. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 14(2). 57–74. 1 indexed citations
5.
Mateo, Ricardo, et al.. (2021). Ranking Quality and Patient Safety Challenges: A Nationwide Survey of Healthcare Quality Experts From General Hospitals in Spain.. Journal of Patient Safety. 17(8). 541–547. 1 indexed citations
6.
Mateo, Ricardo, et al.. (2020). Ranking Quality and Patient Safety Challenges: A Nationwide Survey of Healthcare Quality Experts From General Hospitals in Spain. Journal of Patient Safety. 17(8). 541–547. 5 indexed citations
7.
Jurburg, Daniel, Elisabeth Viles, Martín Tanco, Ricardo Mateo, & Álvaro Lleó. (2019). Understanding the main organisational antecedents of employee participation in continuous improvement. The TQM Journal. 31(3). 359–376. 29 indexed citations
8.
Núñez, Alicia, et al.. (2018). Emergency departments key performance indicators: A unified framework and its practice. The International Journal of Health Planning and Management. 33(4). 915–933. 13 indexed citations
9.
Jurburg, Daniel, Elisabeth Viles, Martín Tanco, Ricardo Mateo, & Álvaro Lleó. (2016). Measure to succeed: How to improve employee participation in continuous improvement. Journal of Industrial Engineering and Management. 9(5). 1059–1059. 9 indexed citations
10.
Viles, Elisabeth, et al.. (2016). Overview of ramp-up curves: A literature review and new challenges. Proceedings of the Institution of Mechanical Engineers Part B Journal of Engineering Manufacture. 232(5). 755–765. 9 indexed citations
11.
Jaca, Carmen, et al.. (2016). The impact of a readiness program for implementing and sustaining continuous improvement processes. The TQM Journal. 28(6). 869–886. 14 indexed citations
12.
Corgnet, Brice, Roberto Hernán González, & Ricardo Mateo. (2015). Cognitive Reflection and the Diligent Worker: An Experimental Study of Millennials. PLoS ONE. 10(11). e0141243–e0141243. 32 indexed citations
13.
Viles, Elisabeth, et al.. (2015). DISEÑO Y VALIDACIÓN DE UN CUESTIONARIO PARA ANALIZAR LA PARTICIPACIÓN DE LOS TRABAJADORES EN LA MEJORA CONTINUA. 3(3). [16 p.]–[16 p.]. 2 indexed citations
14.
Mateo, Ricardo, et al.. (2012). Indications of virtues in conscientiousness and its practice through continuous improvement. Business Ethics A European Review. 21(2). 140–153. 6 indexed citations
15.
Jaca, Carmen, Manuel F. Suárez‐Barraza, Elisabeth Viles, Ricardo Mateo, & Javier Santos. (2011). Survey of sustainability of continuous improvement systems: a comparison of two manufacturing communities in Spain and Mexico. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 7 indexed citations
16.
Santos, Javier, et al.. (2011). LOS SISTEMAS DE MEJORA CONTINUA Y EL DESPILFARRO: LA CONTINUACIÓN DE LA OBRA DE TAYLOR. DYNA. 86(3). 232–240. 1 indexed citations
17.
Jaca, Carmen, et al.. (2010). Sustainability of continuous improvement systems in industry: Survey of BAC and Navarre. SHILAP Revista de lepidopterología. 11 indexed citations
18.
Jaca, Carmen, Ricardo Mateo, Martín Tanco, Elisabeth Viles, & Javier Santos. (2010). Sustainability of continuous improvement systems in industry: Survey of BAC and Navarre. Intangible Capital. 6(1). 4 indexed citations
19.
Mateo, Ricardo, et al.. (2006). Teoría y práctica de la calidad. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja). 29(8). 3427–3433. 4 indexed citations
20.
Mateo, Ricardo, et al.. (2004). Creación de empresas: teoría y práctica. Dialnet (Universidad de la Rioja).

Rankless uses publication and citation data sourced from OpenAlex, an open and comprehensive bibliographic database. While OpenAlex provides broad and valuable coverage of the global research landscape, it—like all bibliographic datasets—has inherent limitations. These include incomplete records, variations in author disambiguation, differences in journal indexing, and delays in data updates. As a result, some metrics and network relationships displayed in Rankless may not fully capture the entirety of a scholar's output or impact.

Explore authors with similar magnitude of impact

Rankless by CCL
2026